I think the answer is John Paul Jones
Hey!
-----------------------------------------------------
Answer:
C. state disputes
-----------------------------------------------------
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation came up with a type of government that turned out to be very weak. This government was made up of one-legislature. This treaty gave power to Congress to give laws, settle fights between states, and declare war. What this treaty lacked was that the Congress couldn't enforce taxes or trades between any of the states. The only way Congress would gain money is if they asked a state to fund them or sell pieces of land.
-----------------------------------------------------
Hope This Helped! Good Luck!
Warhawks because they favored war over negotiation
1. Power to declare war
Congress, not the President, has the power to declare war. This ensures that the people's representatives are heard in considering when to send Americans off to war.
2. The regulate Commerce
This, known is as the Commerce Clause, is the foundation for much of the expansion of the Federal Government since the 1930s. It remains controversial in some circles but allows Congress to get involved in things you would normally think were reserved to the States.
3. Borrow on the credit of the US
The US has debt. The constitution allows for Congress to borrow to pay for things. We will see how this one turns out.
<u>The 2012 Presidential debates:</u>
A presidential debate is an open discussion held during a general political race, where the competitors uncover their political suppositions and open approach proposition, and analysis of them, to potential voters. The themes examined in the discussion are regularly the most dubious issues of the time, and apparently decisions have been almost chosen by these discussions. Up-and-comer discussions are not naturally commanded, yet they are currently viewed as an inborn piece of the political decision process.
Talking time at the discussions was as per the following: At the main presidential discussion, Trump represented 45 minutes and 3 seconds; Clinton represented 41 minutes and 50 seconds. At the second presidential discussion, Trump represented 40 minutes and 10 seconds; Clinton represented 39 minutes and 5 seconds. A Gallup survey found that 72% of the discussion watchers trusted Romney was the unmistakable champ, 20% accepted that Obama had won, and 9% trusted it was a tie or had no supposition; the most stretched out edge of triumph for any presidential discussion in Gallup history.
