Answer:
Total Cost = $309,366
Explanation:
Given:
Number of year = 15 year
Monthly payment = $1,718.70
Find:
Total Cost
Computation:
Total Cost = Number of year x 12 months x Monthly payment
Total Cost = 15 x 12 x 1,718.70
Total Cost = $309,366
Answer:
High-tech firms are hiring expensive, sophisticated people who are in high demand compared to fast food franchises and treat them better to avoid losing them to other companies
Explanation:
High-tech firms are hiring expensive, sophisticated people who are in high demand. This brings about a better treatment of their employees because if they do not offer these amenities to employees, they would become employees of other high-tech companies. Individuals with low skill levels do not get high salaries or benefits. They are not in as high demand as highly skilled workers. It is efficient, but many would argue that it is not fair.
Answer:
(A) Because the regulation effectively reduced the price of cool air, consumers with sufficiently elastic demand might have bought substantially more of it.
Explanation:
If the demand for energy services remains constant, improving energy efficiency will reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. However, many efficiency improvements do not reduce energy consumption by the amount provided by simple engineering models. This is because they make energy services cheaper and therefore increases the consumption of those services.
For example, since low-fuel vehicles make travel cheaper, consumers can choose to drive further, thus offsetting some of the possible energy savings. Similarly, an extensive historical analysis of improvements in technological efficiency has conclusively demonstrated that improvements in energy efficiency were almost always overcome by economic growth, which resulted in a net increase in resource use and associated contamination.
Getting Maximum Results with Minimum Efforts.
Answer:
Option 1 is wrong because in the case of multi-product, breakeven is weighted average which means the sales price will weighted average of sale prices of all the multi-products in the sales mix. If we change the weightings the weighted average costs and selling prices changes and so the contribution changes.
Option 2 is also sligthly wrong because Contribution margin per composite unit decreases if the volume of low contribution margin products increases in the sales mix. This means:
Breakeven Point=Fixed Cost/ Contribution per unit.........equartion 1
If the contribution per unit has been decreased the breakeven will rise.
Its impact depends upon the portfolio of products company is managing. It means it increases breakeven with high effects if the products in sales mix 2 to 3.
Option 3 is 100% right because equation 1 is
Breakeven Point=Fixed Cost/ Contribution per unit
Which says
If the contribution per unit has been decreased the breakeven will rise.
Option 4 is absolutely wrong because if we shift to higher volume in low contribution margin products, Contribution margin per composite unit decreases if the volume of low contribution margin products increases
which means Weighted average contribution has been decreased and as a result breakeven point according to equation 1 has been incresed.
