Option e, using company resources for personal use
He should use his own phone or home device, and not at work
Answer:
mmmm its only about India
Explanation:
i dont stay in India
<span>A. An auditor can accept the uncertainties in the sampling process since they have some idea in which financial statements errors are occurring. In this case their sample is not completely random.
B. The formula AR = IR Ă— CR Ă— DR is often used to describe audit risk. Here, AR is audit risk, IR is inherent risk, CR is control risk, and DR is detection risk. Inherent risk is the risk of a report containing errors due to the complex nature of how the audited business runs. Control risk is the risk that an error may occur but may not be detected by the business itself. Detection risk is the risk that the auditor may fail to find errors that are present in the business' financial reports.
C. An auditor may only sample, or inspect a fraction of a company's financial history. This is done for practical purposes, for there may not be enough time to inspect everything, or it may be too costly. If the auditor is issuing a test of controls, in which they are scrutinizing their target's internal procedures for detecting errors, then sampling may fail to see these errors.</span>
Solution :
Given :
James needs $ 1,000,000 after 15 years.
His IRA deposit is $ 200,000 and is earning at the rate of 8% per annum.
Maturity value of $200,000 after 15 years = 
= $ 634,434.
Balance fund needed after 15 years = 1,000,000 - 634,434
= $ 365,566
Therefore, the future value of the annuity is :
![FV=A[\frac{(1+k)^n-1}{k}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=FV%3DA%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2Bk%29%5En-1%7D%7Bk%7D%5D)
Here, FV = future annuity value = 365,566
A = periodical investment
k = interest rate = 8%
n = period = 15 years
∴![365566 = A\frac{[(1.08)^{15}-1]}{0.08}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=365566%20%3D%20A%5Cfrac%7B%5B%281.08%29%5E%7B15%7D-1%5D%7D%7B0.08%7D)
A = 13,464
Thus, James needs to save $ 13,464 each year end to reach his target.
This sale represent A MITIGATION OF DAMAGE.
The principle of the mitigation of damage states that a person who has suffered an injury or loss should take reasonable action where possible to avoid additional injury. The failure to take reasonable action to prevent further loss may result in reduction in the amount that the person can recover if the case is taken to court.
