By these words, which are part of Johathan's Swift's "A Modest Proposal" (1729), the author is referring to the claim to the throne of England, Ireland and Scotland by James Francis Edward Stuart, son of King James II. The latter was a Catholic King, who had already fathered a daughter named Mary; until James Francis Edward's birth, Mary, who had been raised as a Protestant, was the legitimate heiress to the English throne. James Francis Edward was a Catholic. The English Protestants were reluctant to have a Catholic king, as they did not wish to be under the political influence of the Pope. Therefore, they rebelled against James II, whom they overthrew. Mary and her husband William of Orange then became Protestant Queen and King of England, Ireland and Scotland. Ireland is the "home" to which Swift refers in this statement. Since the Irish were and are Catholic, they wished to help James Francis Edward Stuart regain his position as heir to the British, Irish and Scottish crown. Swift contrasts these irish men with those Protestants who would rather leave England than pay taxes to a Catholic king.
James Francis Edward's attempts to regain the crown were unsuccessful.
Daughter, Hygieia, was the goddess of health and cleanliness. 3. Tradition states that Asclepius angered Hades, god of the underworld,
The best rebuttal to this anti-burn viewpoint is this:
- Without the controlled fire, more fuel may have built up, leading to greater damage.
<h3 /><h3>What is a rebuttal?</h3>
A rebuttal is a rejection of a previously stated claim. In the passage above, the claim is that the controlled fire caused significant losses to the people and environment.
But if there is a rebuttal that claims that the controlled fire was helpful because it greatly limited the reach of the burn, then we can consider that as a valid rebuttal.
A rebuttal is meant to find a fault in the claim and gives a reason why the opposite of the claim is accurate.
Learn more about rebuttals here:
brainly.com/question/24690335
#SPJ1
