Answer:
Hey there!
You are correct! The colony of Pennsylvania was founded by William Penn in 1682, as a safe place for Quakers to live and practice their faith.
Let me know if this helps :)
Power was in the hands of the land owners - A
Although, it's obvious that for Japanese feudalism it was not the same as for European feudalism in terms of laws, capabilities, rights and duties, the ones who owned the land still were the ones who had the most power.
Answer:
The French demanded that the United States provide France with a low-interest loan, assume and pay American merchant claims against the French, and lastly pay a substantial bribe to Talleyrand. The U.S. envoys were shocked, and also skeptical that any concessions would bring about substantial changes in French <u>policy.</u><u> </u><u>So</u><u> </u><u>United</u><u> </u><u>States</u><u> </u><u>established</u><u> </u><u>New</u><u> </u><u>negotiations</u><u> </u><u>with</u><u> </u><u>france</u><u>.</u>
- - Concerns struck about about allowing or banning slavery in newly established the territories<span> during the 1800s consisted of about the newer established territorials could have been a slave state, or a free state. Now they were concerned because no one liked the idea of becoming a free state as it was worried what would happen with banning slavery and such. Now if because a slave state then the senate would be more controlled by the south, as if a free, then northern people would have control. Now this scared everyone as there are some bad things about becoming a free state and some bad things about becoming a slave state. This concerns such as no more slaves, or many more. More people could become slaves and be sold, as a free state there is no more of that and sometimes people fear it due to making money off of it. These are the most common concerns about allowing or bann</span>ing slavery in newly established te<span>rritories during the 1800s.
</span>
No, I do not agree with their view. Hamilton and Madison believed that a bill of rights would limit the rights that would be protected by the constitution, because some rights would be specified while others wouldn't.