what was the major dividing factor between the two first political parties, the federalist and the democratic republicans

1 answer:

8 0

The major dividing factor between the two first political parties, the federalist and the democratic republicans, was how "powerful" the central government should be over the states, with the former wanting more power and the latter wanting less.

You might be interested in

What issue led to the split between the Sunni and Shia in Islam? Question 1 options: The Shia believe only Arabs could be Muslim

Zarrin [17]

I think the second one might be the answer but please let me know if Im wrong

7 0

3 years ago

What was the Schlieffen Plan?

OLga [1]

The Schlieffen Plan was created by General Count Alfred von Schlieffen in December 1905. The Schlieffen Plan was the operational plan for a designated attack on France once Russia, in response to international tension, had started to mobilise her forces near the German border

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is one reason that the Constitutional Convention decided they needed a

o-na [289]

The one reason that the Constitutional Convention decided they needed a document to replace the Articles of Confederation, because the articles outlined an outdated tax system.

Option A

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

The Article of Confederation was replaced because it had many loophole and weaknesses which majorly exploited the Constitution while giving power to the state; more power than the federal government. The Article of Confederation was replaced in 1789 because there was a need for a strong Federal government.

The article was meant to preserve the sovereignty and independence of states. However, during the ratification, it was established that nothing had changed politically since enforcing the Article and even after ratification, things remained the same. It was replaced to strengthen the national government.

3 0

2 years ago

What were called factories during the british rule

adoni [48]

Answer: i think it was called atmospheric steam engine

4 0

3 years ago

In your opinion, is taking the law into one's own hands

Svet_ta [14]

The simple answer to your complex question is NO. This is assuming that you live in a country where there are good laws (remember that history is full of bad governments that implemented bad laws) and that law enforcement is effective. Simplisticly, you should only ask yourself this question when your or your families life is being threatened and law enforcement is not around. Your response must still be within the constraints of your laws or you will find yourself in hot water. I'm not even going to try to discuss the ethics and morals that can apply as the situation can vary immensely. Keep it simple - don't operate outside the law, rather fight against unjust laws.

4 0

2 years ago