Answer: A- Helen Keller Suffered an Illness that left her blind and deaf.
Explanation:
Basically, Helen Keller grew up blind and deaf after contacting a disease. So she met Anne after she became b/d and, Anne Sullivan gave Keller the doll when they met after her disabilities, and her life was put into a film way after her life.
A persuasive essay is an essay that aims to convince the reader of a certain point of view and its superiority over opposing points of view. In the sentence, "Sooner or later we must all accept our obligation to future generations", the author is summing up his argument and persuading the readers to accept their "...obligation to future generations". Option B, C and D are not conclusions to a persuasive essay because they either state personal opinions or contain subjective claims.
Well they play the blame game. And they use people's minds to help them. So they choose to pick a side this creates wars. The use force and tryanny. Even persuasion to make people help them
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
Answer:
I dont understand
Explanation:
the dots dont separate them maybe ask thia question again and separate it
