All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is not a possible environmental consequence of urban sprawl?

Social Studies

2 answers:

postnew [5]3 years ago

8 0

The correct option is (d) none of the above.

Further Explanation:

All the given options deforestation, pollution, loss of natural resources are the possible environmental consequences of urban sprawl.

Urban sprawl is also known as sprawl or ‘suburban sprawl’. Urban sprawl is referred to the expansion of low-density, poorly planned, auto dependent development which is spreaded out over large amounts of land, long distance between commercial and residential uses with harmful impacts on the human being in such areas and the wildlife and ecosystems that have been displaced.

Effects of Urban Sprawl:

1. Increased Air Pollution

2. Increased water Pollution

3. Increased water consumption

4. Degraded Human Health

5. Wasted crowded schools and tax money

6. Loss in parks, open space, wildlife habitats and farmland

Learn More:

1. How were people in the middle colonies different from those in the New England and southern colonies?

brainly.com/question/1720656

2. Which state ratified the constitution after congress agreed to amend the constitution to include the bill of rights?

brainly.com/question/9951862

3. Under new imperialism, Europe did not need large numbers of people to control territories because of

brainly.com/question/187221

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Environmental Consequences

Subject: Social Studies

Keywords: urban sprawl, deforestation, pollution, natural resources, tax money, farmland, wildlife habitants

Vlad1618 [11]3 years ago

5 0

I believe the answer is: D. none of the above

Urban sprawl refers to the expansion of population from high density area to the low density area.

When this happen, deforestation will increase to provide the population with space to build houses, pollution would increase to the the increase in automobiles, and loss of natural resources would occur because the increasing numbers of consumers.

You might be interested in

I could really use your help

Nady [450]

Answer:

missiles, Turkey, 1969, to prevent more misses from coming, Trained Cuban invade Cuba, false, Richard Nixon

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP I BEGGING YOU THIS

marishachu [46]

Answer:

Most of the settled lands of Canada, in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, were transferred from First Nations to the Crown (the Government) through treaties. Today both sides agree that the so-called Indian Treaties are agreements between the Crown (the Government) and First Nations, in which the First Nations exchanged some of their interests in specific areas of their ancestral lands in return for various kinds of payments and promises from Crown officials. However, each side has a different interpretation of what was intended by the agreements. The Canadians (British) and the First Nations were at the same meetings, listened to the same speeches (translated) and signed the same pieces of paper. Yet they had (and still have) two totally different concepts of what the treaties were about, and what each side was promising. The differences in understanding are rooted in two totally different world views, and two totally different concepts of land ownership, and two colliding purposes. The concept of private ownership of land by an individual, who could build a fence and keep others out forever, was totally foreign to First Nations people. First Nations had an oral tradition. They passed down important information by the spoken word during important ceremonies and at celebrations. What was said was what was important to them, not what was written on paper. Though they did not have a written tradition, in the European sense, they recorded important events by sewing beaded wampum belts. Wampum belts signifying treaties became sacred objects that were brought out at certain times, Then elders recited the terms and understandings of the agreement commemorated by that ceremonial wampum belt. The Government View of Treaties The First Nations View of Treaties The British and Canadian governments saw treaties as a way to legalize the ceding of Indian lands to clear the way for European settlement, mining, and railways. Treaties were intended to extinguish all First Nations claims and rights to their land forever, except in those lands set apart as Reserves of land for the bands to live on. In return, the government would make a one-time payment to the bands, plus a specified annual sum. As well, treaties had terms dealing with hunting and fishing rights, as well as education and health care. Treaties were also intended to offer the Indians some protection from the consequences of new settlement, and some assistance in adapting to new ways of living as the old ways became less feasible. Treaties were also expected to be the first step towards assimilation. Government expected First Nations people to give up their culture, including their customs, their language, their religious beliefs, their ceremonies, and everything else that differentiated them from Canadians of British origin. also Nations saw treaties in a different light. To them, treaties were solemn pacts establishing the future basis of relations between their people, for whom Canada is an ancient homeland, and the new Government of Canada and its people and Nations representatives signed the treaties to ensure that they would receive some government assistance in the future to ensure the survival of their people. They believed (because all the Treaty Commissioners told them so) that they would be cherished and protected by the Crown with whom they had a special relationship.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

7 0

3 years ago

If an employee at headquarters feels that he or she has been discriminated against, who should inform?

fomenos

The offie of equal rights.

8 0

3 years ago

During substage ________, babies repeat actions that result in exciting or pleasurable outcomes.

emmainna [20.7K]

Substage 3

develops schematic ideas deliberate actions focus on repeating interesting effects direct imitation focused on self simple associations increased physical skills enable infant to handle materials more effectively

Activities included are
reaches for and grasps objects, manipulates items repeats interesting or surprising actions copies another baby banging with a wooden spoon links objects by function sits and passes toy from one hand to the other

6 0

3 years ago

The North supported the war because it helped sell more industrial products made in America.

Firdavs [7]

True

Reason: The north is full of booming capitalism instead of rural farmland

7 0

2 years ago