Answer: The right to have dangerous substances identified
Explanation:
The employee right under the OSH Act is Kaylee exercising is the right to have dangerous substances identified.
Answer:Derived credibility
Explanation:
Credibility is the quality that we may possess and can make us be trustworthy. If you can't be trusted people will find it hard to believe even the things you say. It mostly based on how the audience sees you and how they think of your competence and personality
Derived credibility is established as the speaker delivers the speech this is based on how professional the speaker is. Derived means it is drawn from the way you deliver your speech.
So your speech is what gives you this credibility. It can also be how you present yourself in your resume.
Answer:
- Sampling bias.
Explanation:
Sampling bias is demonstrated as the partiality or bias displayed while selecting the samples(selection of non-random sample with lower sampling probability) for a particular survey or research which eventually affects the conclusion of the .
As per the question, the most significant problem with the given inference would be 'sampling bias' as the samples are not selected on random basis(interviewed people support arts on money basis) which is reflected through the observation that 'a large majority of Americans are willing to support the arts by giving money to local theater groups.' This bias in sampling may affect the validity of the results and lead to a faulty conclusion.
The fact that people who watch a lot of violent TV are also more likely to be aggressive does not in itself proof a cause-effect relationship. That is, there is no evidence that one situation is a cause and the other one is a consequence (causation). It only proves that both characteristics are present together (correlation).
This could be a case of “spurious correlation,” which implies that two characteristics are often present together because there is a third factor that influences both of them.
For example, if we assume that this case refers to minors, it could be that minors who watch a lot of violent TV are neglected by their parents. Additionally, it could be that children who behave aggressively are also neglected by their parents. If that were the case, then being neglected would be a more likely predictor of violent behaviour, as opposed to watching violent TV.
In order to make sure there is a cause-effect relationship, we would need to perform an experiment where all other factors are controlled.
