Answer:
Explanation:
70 percent
Water in Daily Life
The average American family uses more than 300 gallons of water per day at home. Roughly 70 percent of this use occurs indoors. Nationally, outdoor water use accounts for 30 percent of household use yet can be much higher in drier parts of the country and in more water-intensive landscapes
Answer:C) noncompensatory decision
Explanation:
Peter's decisions is fixed and made up no matter what comparisons are made of other universities but he has made up a firm decision that he can not compromise no matter how tempting the fact still remains that his girlfriend will not be close to those universities which are further away from his home town.
He had already calculated the cost of his decision and made conclusion that this is the best decision for him .
The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by It is criticized for becoming a justification for intervention on behalf of state interests not related to protection of human rights.
<h3>The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P)?</h3>
All Heads of State and Government endorsed the duty to safeguard populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity at the 2005 World Summit. Three equally important pillars support the responsibility to protect (commonly abbreviated as "R2P"): the obligation of each State to protect its citizens (pillar I); the obligation of the international community to support States in protecting their citizens (pillar II); and the obligation of the international community to act when a State is blatantly failing to protect its citizens (pillar III). When the concept was adopted in 2005, it was a solemn commitment with high hopes for a world free of these atrocities.
- There are several circumstances in today's world where populations are at risk of R2P crimes or where such crimes are already occurring. These crises are occurring in a climate of waning internationalism, declining adherence to international human rights and humanitarian law, political division in important decision-making bodies like the Security Council, and a degree of defeatism toward advancing ambitious agendas like protection.
- Alarming contempt for core principles of international law has been on display. We are witnessing widespread and egregious attacks on protected civilian sites, such as hospitals and schools, as well as on protected individuals, including humanitarian and health-care workers, in many of the armed conflicts that have broken out in recent years.
- The most severe transgressions of international humanitarian and human rights law, which may qualify as atrocity crimes, continue to be committed by the armed forces and auxiliary militia of States, which is a depressing reality given the rise of violent, non-state armed organizations.
- Similarly, governments do not hold those responsible for atrocity crimes accountable for their deeds. In order to prevent the investigation and prosecution of atrocity crimes, some States parties to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, are not collaborating with the Court or are even considering withdrawing from the Statute.
- The Security Council is becoming less willing to bring issues to the Court, and certain political figures obviously want to avoid being held accountable in court.
Learn more about Protect (R2P) here:
brainly.com/question/16179318
#SPJ4
Answer:
I believe the answer would be D) Indian ocean.
Explanation:
The Indian Ocean lies between the continents of Africa, Asia, and Australia.
Here's a nice little image of some arrows I drew on a map to show that it is indeed south of Asia and between Africa and Australia:
Answer:
Jerry owes a duty of slight care, in regards to the parakeet
Explanation:
In this situation since this is a bailment for the sole benefit of the bailor, Jerry owes a duty of slight care, in regards to the parakeet. This refers to the fact that Jerry has a legal obligation to adhere to the rules set forth by Tom and demonstrate a level of reasonable care when performing these rules/tasks, since not doing so may bring harm to the parakeet or Tom. Which by neglecting to make sure that the cage was closed properly the bird is forever gone and Tom is hurt both financially and emotionally from the parakeets loss.
