1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovikov84 [41]
3 years ago
14

What did Churchill predict will happen in Czechoslovakia in his speech?

History
2 answers:
Vladimir79 [104]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

He said that in the future it would no longer be independent, that they would be engulfed by the Nazis.

Explanation:

Georgia [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: They would no longer be independent; they would be controlled by the Nazis

Explanation:

You might be interested in
4. Would you characterize these individuals as idealists or practical reformers? Explain your reasoning
pentagon [3]

Each reformer belongs to one of these groups.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The individuals who are considered to be idealists are the people who do not take practical things in their mind. They are more guided more by ideals and the values that they imbibe.

On the other hand, the people who are practical reformers are the people who give more importance to practical things in life. There fore they make changes in the society according to the practical experiences that they see in life.

4 0
3 years ago
Who were the Loyalists?
arlik [135]

Answer:

Loyalists wanted to pursue peaceful forms of protest because they believed that violence would give rise to mob rule or tyranny. They also believed that independence would mean the loss of economic benefits derived from membership in the British mercantile system.

Explanation:

so b sorry if wrong

4 0
3 years ago
President Truman discusses two different ways of life in this excerpt. What do you think he means by this? Do you agree with Pre
Oxana [17]

Answer: Answer and explanation #1

President Harry Truman talks about "two ways of life" in a speech to Congress in 1947.

When Truman talks about two ways of life he calls them one "free" and other "totalitarian". By this time the term totalitarianism had already become famous to classify extremely authoritarian regimes like the nazi and soviet regimes.

Thus the president can only be referring to the opposition between capitalist and communist economic systems represented by the US and Soviet Union.

To answer if you agree with President Truman's argument you should ask yourself a few questions: was the US back then a regime that really followed the will of the majority? how was the US back then? how was the USSR? how did political persecution work there? was it really impossible to both systems to exist in the world? In short, you must check Truman's arguments to see if you agree or disagree with them.

Answer and explanation #2

Most historians agree that this speech was a declaration of the Cold War. It was given when the US saw that the USSR could amplify its influence on Western Europe and Africa: Truman spoke to Congress to get approval to financially aid Turkey and Greece regimes against leftist groups supported by the USSR.

So we see in this speech the entire framing of the Cold War: a war that was not fought directly but rather by securing influence zones. This speech was the beginning of the Truman Doctrine: it started the Containment Policy which compromised to stop the spreading of communism to other areas of the world other than the USSR.  

What Truman started in this speech was the modus operandi of the Cold War until its end in the late 20th century.

Explanation: if this is wrong i’m sorry and plz mar brainlist

3 0
3 years ago
Aside from Robin Hood being a trickster, what was his most prominent trait?
Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

B. Stealing from the rich to give to the poor

Explanation:    Robin hood was a nice person

7 0
3 years ago
Which best describes an unintended consequence of Prohibition?
Xelga [282]

Answer:

Explanation:

The greatest unintended consequence of Prohibition however, was the plainest to see. For over a decade, the law that was meant to foster temperance instead fostered intemperance and excess. The solution the United States had devised to address the problem of alcohol abuse had instead made the problem even worse.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the name given to tye new deal program designed to employ artists?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Federalist view the power of the national government?
    5·1 answer
  • Identify where revolutions took place in 1848.
    11·1 answer
  • which of the following conclusions do U.S. attitudes toward the panama canal during the 20th century support? A.historical conte
    14·2 answers
  • Why were solon and pericles most alike in their political impact
    5·1 answer
  • 1. How did the Fugitive Slave Acts affect free blacks?
    6·1 answer
  • Any one live in Nashville
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think that we need government? explain in one paragraph​
    10·2 answers
  • 12. Which part of England did the Royalists control during all four years? the northern part b. the southwest peninsula c. the w
    8·1 answer
  • How did the proprietors of the Maryland colony alter its government in 1635?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!