Answer:
Explanation: yes they can btw i answered the empire state building exercise go check it out
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
President Eisenhower was not recognized for addressing any civil rights issues such as Little Rock Nine. However, with elections rolling around, Eisenhower took large strides to ensure that this was passed to make sure that he would win the "black vote". Yet, to get the bill to pass required ample amounts of revisions to create a compromise with the southerners and southern senators: which was overriding state laws, using armed forces to enforce these civil rights, and those interfering with the bill would be sent to trial against a judge (not an all-white jury as only white citizens could be jury-members at the time).
However, many continued to vote as they believed the bill wouldn't last long.
I did this a couple years back... the prime minister is the monarch in canada
