Answer:
Self-determination theory
Explanation:
Self-determination theory observes how individuals go pursuing fulfilment, a state of well being that includes:
<em>The psychological needs and the growth are essential to Self-determination theory: The feelings of confidence, autonomy, relatedness</em>
<em> </em>
Being able to matter in the life of other people, having a sense of mastery over the environment, and autonomy concerning others was self-initiated, wholeheartedly to begin actions without asking for others opinion.
Motivation will be the centre of this theory, so an example will typically be :
If someone decides to learn something and engage immediately without hesitating and not to take into consideration the level of difficulty neither the opinion of his friends or social connotations related to it.
Doing something for the sake of it will be referred to as self-propelled behaviour.
Answer:
Frictionally unemployed is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Cultural frame switching
Explanation:
Cultural frame switching -
It is process of changing from one cultural mindset to any other cultural mindset due to the upcoming exposure , is referred to as the cultural frame switching.
The culture have various symbolic stereotypes , languages and culture .
The biculturals attains certain culture similar to the typical monocultural individuals in prior cross-cultural research .
Hence, from the given information of the question,
The correct term is Cultural frame switching.
The first alternative is correct (A).
Large corporations are publicly traded, meaning that the company is divided into shares that are distributed in the financial market to investors. These investors, in turn, delegate a team of directors who make strategic decisions of the firm, theoretically independent. However, the directors make their decisions thinking about the profit that will pass to the owners of the companies' shares, to which they report.
This model, in a way, places the responsibility of business owners in the background. In the event of a lawsuit, the company is first investigated as well as its directors. In order to reach the owners, a more complex legal process is necessary.
A recent example: a mining company caused an environmental and human catastrophe in Brazil, destroying an ecosystem and killing hundreds of people. The shareholders were not held responsible, only the company as an institution is being processed. The board was fired, but the real owners of the company suffered nothing.
