1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnyKZ [126]
3 years ago
13

John Marshall was instrumental in establishing the principle that the Supreme Court has the authority to declare laws and action

s unconstitutional. This authority is called A) habeas corpus. B) judicial review. C) diplomatic immunity. D) executive privilege.
History
2 answers:
dolphi86 [110]3 years ago
7 0

<em><u>B) Judicial Review. </u></em>

<em><u>The first of his iconic cases, Justice John Marshall was instrumental in establishing the principle of ‘judicial review’, which vested with the Supreme Court of the United States with the power to determine the constitutional validity of all laws that were passed by the United States Senate or the legislature. This was called the power of ‘judicial review’. He further concluded that any law passed by the legislature would be examined for constitutional validity, and the laws which would not be found accruing to the principles of the U.S. Constitution would be deemed invalid. </u></em>

Further Explanation:

Justice John Marshall pioneered the formulation of the principle of ‘Judicial Review’ as a part of his conclusions and judgments passed on the ‘Marbury v Madison’ case, which went to the Supreme Court during 1803. President John Adams had appointed William Marbury as justice for Peace for the District of Columbia and had entrusted John Marshall with the task of handing over the charge of the Commission to Marbury. However, Marshall entrusted the handing over of documents with the next Secretary of State, James Madison, instead of accomplishing the task himself. Unfortunately, Madison was unable to carry out the task as the appointment of Marbury was opposed stiffly by the newly elected President, Thomas Jefferson, who refused to hand over the commission to Marbury, as it was drawn up by the supporters of his political adversary. Thus, Marbury reacted by challenging this decision in a lawsuit filed with the Supreme Court against the then Secretary of State, James Madison. Justice James Marshall presided over the proceedings and determined that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which empowered the Supreme Court to issue writs to government officials was unconstitutional. He also laid the basis of the principles of judicial review, by which the constitutional validity of all laws passed henceforth would be determined.

Learn more:

1. Cuantos siglos dour la culture Mexican?  

brainly.com/question/6242334

2. When trying officials who have been impeached by the house of representatives? brainly.com/question/6242334

Answer Details:

Level: High School, Graduation.

Chapter: The U.S. Constitution.

Subject: Political Science.

Additional Remarks:

This chapter is a part of Political Sciences and deals with the history of the American Constitution, the Constitutional Assembly, Articles and sections, Fundamental rights and duties, and Constitutional Amendments.

Keywords:

Judicial Review, Constitutional validity, Supreme Court, legislature, U.S. Constitution, Marbury v Madison case, Section 13 of Judiciary Act of 1789.

Mariana [72]3 years ago
6 0

YOUR ANSWER WOULD BE

(B) Judicial Review

You might be interested in
Who has the power to veto? How can you override a veto?
scoray [572]

Answer: The President has the power to veto.

Explanation: You can override a veto by each chamber of Congress votint on a bill vetoed by the President. To pass a bill over the president's objections requires a two-thirds vote in each Chamber.

5 0
3 years ago
Earle provides an economic and geographic perspective for establishing the English colonies in North America. Discuss the motiva
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

The Church of England, Protestants, and puritans. The church of England was like get out if you don't join. Also they refused to support in parliament.

4 0
2 years ago
What might be the consequences if citizens were not required to serve on a jury?
rusak2 [61]
If the citizens were not required to serve on jury, we had to rely solely on government decision to establish the law.
This actually had a lot of negative outcomes. Such as the people could no longer held the power in lawmaking process which cause government could do whatever they like.
5 0
3 years ago
2. How did the domine theory support the policy of containment of
Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

the Domino's theory is is that if you count falls to communism the test around them would to so the US tried to step in for that reason.

3 0
3 years ago
Which rights are guaranteed to all united states citizens by the fourteenth amendment?
andre [41]
B. Equal Protection is your answer
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did French &amp; Spanish relations with Native Americans differ?
    7·1 answer
  • Please?..
    8·1 answer
  • What organization succeded the league of nation as an important tool for maintaining peace after world war 2
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a limitation of progressivism
    12·2 answers
  • How did the debate over slavery affect kansas during the 1850s?
    8·1 answer
  • What is imperialism and how did it contribute to the beginning of WWI?
    9·1 answer
  • How was a tribune of the plebs like an American president?
    13·2 answers
  • Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe<br> he
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Enlightenment impact the rights of women? Please put some causes and effects to support the answer
    6·1 answer
  • Proxy wars were primarily a product of
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!