1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erik [133]
3 years ago
7

What were the differences between the triple alliance and the triple entente

History
2 answers:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
7 0
The Triple Entente WAS NOT an alliance - nothing was ever signed by Britain.It was an understanding in the early 20th century between Britain,France,and Russia by which they all agreed that none of them liked Germany much,and effectively admitted that they all therefore had a common interest in opposing German aims.

The Triple Alliance was a full alliance between Germany,Austria-Hungary,and Italy signed in 1882,the purpose of which was to keep France isolated.When WW1 began in 1914,Italy welshed on the alliance on the grounds that the war was caused by German aggression (a popular international view long before the Treaty of Versailles).
Savatey [412]3 years ago
5 0
<span>Triple Entente Alliance of Britain, France, and Russia before World War I. It developed from the Franco-Russian Alliance (1894) formed to counterbalance the threat posed by the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria, and Italy.</span>
You might be interested in
If the Patriot Act iS successful at stopping terrorist attacks, why are some Americans against it?
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

Some are against the patriot act because it allows the government to basically conduct searches on personal records and many other things if they suspect someone of being a terrorist, according to the ACLU it also "violates the constitution in several ways".

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
From cieza's perspective, what were the most admirable qualities of this empire? bh
Eddi Din [679]
<span>From Cieza's perspective, the admirable qualities of this empire are the strong and organized system offers a good quality, he believes that the Inca peoples are well off and wealthy, and they had no clue if or when a take over could occur so they were always prepared with troops in the waiting.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
How did the slaves get to the colonies
NeX [460]
By European travelers going to the tip of Africa and then coming back across the sea to America and the slaves were bought by colonists.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best summarizes the main reason why the united states became involved in the vietnam war
ivann1987 [24]
The main reason was to prevent communism in Vietnam Also to Help reduce the french influence towards Vietnam. Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following Native American tribes helped the pilgrims to survive in the New World? a. Apache c. Sioux b. Wampanoags
barxatty [35]
It was the Wampanoags or B.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did cities become increasingly divided by class
    12·2 answers
  • The bill of rights was adopted primarily in response to
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Pennsylvania and Georgia choose a unicameral legislature and a weak governor
    5·2 answers
  • How many times does one need to fail to succeed
    6·2 answers
  • On a presidential campaign poster from the 1800s, a bright and large sun is shining behind the candidate. Using what you know ab
    15·1 answer
  • What motivated people in europe to for new trading routes
    7·1 answer
  • IBIGAY ANG KAHULUGAN NG PANGALAN,KABUHAYAN AT RELIHIYON NG MICRONESIAN
    11·1 answer
  • Why did most immigrants settle near one another in Oklahoma?
    5·2 answers
  • Why was Marbury v. Madison an important case?
    14·2 answers
  • “As long as I live, I'll hear waterfalls and birds and winds sing. I'll interpret the rocks, learn the language of flood, storm,
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!