1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erik [133]
3 years ago
7

What were the differences between the triple alliance and the triple entente

History
2 answers:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
7 0
The Triple Entente WAS NOT an alliance - nothing was ever signed by Britain.It was an understanding in the early 20th century between Britain,France,and Russia by which they all agreed that none of them liked Germany much,and effectively admitted that they all therefore had a common interest in opposing German aims.

The Triple Alliance was a full alliance between Germany,Austria-Hungary,and Italy signed in 1882,the purpose of which was to keep France isolated.When WW1 began in 1914,Italy welshed on the alliance on the grounds that the war was caused by German aggression (a popular international view long before the Treaty of Versailles).
Savatey [412]3 years ago
5 0
<span>Triple Entente Alliance of Britain, France, and Russia before World War I. It developed from the Franco-Russian Alliance (1894) formed to counterbalance the threat posed by the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria, and Italy.</span>
You might be interested in
explique como o processo dos cercamentos de terrar na inglaterra influenciou o processo revolucionário inglês durante o século X
Tanya [424]

TRANSLATED ANSWER :explain how the process of the earthen enclosures in England influenced the English revolutionary process during the seventeenth century : ANSWER :  Enclosure (sometimes inclosure) was the legal process in England of consolidating (enclosing) small landholdings into larger farms.[1] Once enclosed, use of the land became restricted to the owner, and it ceased to be common land for communal use. In England and Wales the term is also used for the process that ended the ancient system of arable farming in open fields. Under enclosure, such land is fenced (enclosed) and deeded or entitled to one or more owners. The process of enclosure began to be a widespread feature of the English agricultural landscape during the 16th century. By the 19th century, unenclosed commons had become largely restricted to rough pasture in mountainous areas and to relatively small parts of the lowlands.

Enclosure could be accomplished by buying the ground rights and all common rights to accomplish exclusive rights of use, which increased the value of the land. The other method was by passing laws causing or forcing enclosure, such as Parliamentary enclosure involving an Inclosure Act. The latter process of enclosure was sometimes accompanied by force, resistance, and bloodshed, and remains among the most controversial areas of agricultural and economic history in England. Marxist and neo-Marxist historians argue that rich landowners used their control of state processes to appropriate public land for their private benefit.[2][better source needed] During the Georgian era, the process of enclosure created a landless working class that provided the labour required in the new industries developing in the north of England. For example: "In agriculture the years between 1760 and 1820 are the years of wholesale enclosure in which, in village after village, common rights are lost".[3] E. P. Thompson argues that "Enclosure (when all the sophistications are allowed for) was a plain enough case of class robbery."[4][5]

W. A. Armstrong, among others, argued that this is perhaps an oversimplification, that the better-off members of the European peasantry encouraged and participated actively in enclosure, seeking to end the perpetual poverty of subsistence farming. "We should be careful not to ascribe to [enclosure] developments that were the consequence of a much broader and more complex process of historical change."[6] "The impact of eighteenth and nineteenth century enclosure has been grossly exaggerated ..."[7][8]

Enclosure is considered one of the causes of the British Agricultural Revolution. Enclosed land was under control of the farmer who was free to adopt better farming practices. There was widespread agreement in contemporary accounts that profit making opportunities were better with enclosed land.[9] Following enclosure, crop yields increased while at the same time labour productivity increased enough to create a surplus of labour. The increased labour supply is considered one of the causes of the Industrial Revolution.[10] Marx argued in Capital that enclosure played a constitutive role in the revolutionary transformation of feudalism into capitalism, both by transforming land from a means of subsistence into a means to realize profit on commodity markets (primarily wool in the English case), and by creating the conditions for the modern labour market by transforming small peasant proprietors and serfs into agricultural wage-labourers, whose opportunities to exit the market declined as the common lands were enclosed.

7 0
3 years ago
Topic : origins of the cold war​
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

1. Poverty and Homelessness. Poverty and homelessness are worldwide problems. ...

Climate Change. A warmer, changing climate is a threat to the entire world. ...

Overpopulation. ...

Immigration Stresses

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Is this statement true or false Each Plains Indian tribe decorated clothing with different designs A true B false
iVinArrow [24]

Answer: true

Explanation:

this statement is true; however the colors on their clothing are the same

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the moon landing is considered part of Kennedy's legacy even though it happened during the nixon administration why is this?​
KatRina [158]

Answer:

Explanation:"We choose to go to the Moon" is the famous tagline of a speech about the effort to reach the Moon delivered by United States President John F. Kennedy to a large crowd gathered at Rice Stadium in Houston, Texas on September 12, 1962.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. true or false: All critics of slavery were from the North
Dima020 [189]

Answer:

1.false

2.true

3.true

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the United States mobilize for World War I?
    11·1 answer
  • Why are senators required to work in at least three committees?
    13·1 answer
  • Paul Robeson supported the idea that:
    7·2 answers
  • One weakness of the articles of confederation was that it
    13·2 answers
  • The map shows the ancient Middle East. What is the purpose of this kind of map? To explain what natural resources were available
    8·1 answer
  • How do you write this in number form twelve thousand, nine hundred fourteen
    11·2 answers
  • Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following revealed Germany's attempt to ally with Mexico against the United States?
    9·2 answers
  • Summarize Andrew Jackson's presidency.<br> (100 points) its a pre-writing
    13·2 answers
  • What were three impacts of the Opium<br> ethree<br> Trade on China?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!