1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slavikrds [6]
3 years ago
15

Who opposed ratifying the constitution? What was their major argument against ratification?

History
1 answer:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
6 0
The Federalist. The major argument is the constitution gave too much power to the government
You might be interested in
Amendment X
nordsb [41]

The problem of how much power the federal government should have has been a problem in history for ages. This can be seen after the Revolutionary War with the Articles of Confederation. Many people were scared of the federal government obtaining power after the Revolutionary War, as a lot of people did not want to have what happened with Great Britain happen again.

Amendment X, or the Tenth Amendment, states that the "<em>powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people</em>."

This statement limits the power of the federal government by granting all powers that are not already granted to the government to the citizens or the people. The federal government does not have all of the power to do everything and the power to do certain things are with the states and the people. This can be seen with local taxes, certain licenses, elections, and other things.

8 0
3 years ago
The success of rice as a perfect crop for south carolina was helped by the development of:
harina [27]
The achievement of rice as an ideal harvest for South Carolina was helped by the formation of water system frameworks that enabled workers to surge and deplete the fields. By 1700, tobacco, rice, and indigo were the most critical fare products of Maryland, Carolinas, and Virginia.
7 0
3 years ago
If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
DIA [1.3K]

Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:

A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.

<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>

This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.

In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.

Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
What are your thoughts about the media? please list pros and cons
Mars2501 [29]

Answer: Like everything, social media use has pros and cons.

Pros:

You meet people on social media you’d never have a chance to meet offline. You network with like-minded people from all walks of life.

Social media is educational. When I find content shared on social media I want to reference in blog posts or learn new information for blog posts I’m writing, I read it.

Social media is informative. For instance, I learn about trending news on Twi.tter.

Social media can be profitable. In fact, I’ve sold books on Twi.tter.

Social media is great for lead generation. I promote my email list all the time on Insta.gram and Twi.tter.

Social media is fun! I get out my creative side by making Insta.gram Stories, and the Stickers and GIFs are cute.

Free tools exist to help you. In fact, Buffer posts at optimal times. Free graphic design tools help you make appealing graphics.

Cons:

Social media is addictive.

Social media drains time.

Social media can be costly. I keep shopping! Also, if you pay for a boost in content visibility, it’s not free. Tools can be pricey as well.

Social media can have rules. Insta.gram bans people for 3rd-party app use and Qu.ora criticizes people if they link they’re link dropping and not helping.

Hope this helps...... Stay safe and have a Merry Christmas!!!!!!!! :D

8 0
2 years ago
Wich area did the Quakers settle in
katovenus [111]

They formed a settlement at Salem, New Jersey, in 1675. In 1681, King Charles II granted William Penn, a Quaker, a charter for the area that was to become Pennsylvania. Penn guaranteed the settlers of his colony freedom of religion. So depending on what time period you look at it will be different.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is culture?<br> answer in your OWN words.
    5·1 answer
  • In what way did the power of Carnegie and Rockefeller lead to Progressive desire to break up trusts in the early 20th century?
    9·1 answer
  • Solar panels are a popular choice for homeowners who want to take advantage of alternate energy sources. These systems are a way
    12·1 answer
  • Which describes the employment of women during World War II?
    8·1 answer
  • HURRY PLEASEEEEEEEE What were four major events in U.S. history in the 1900s?
    6·2 answers
  • Hiiiiiii Can you help me pleeeeeeeaaase :
    13·1 answer
  • What were some of the first colleges established for African Americans? What was their initial emphasis? List them by name, loca
    8·1 answer
  • This was a political movement that wanted to be for the people
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me? :( I will give brainliest!!
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Jackson have an overwhelming win?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!