Answer:
A, hope this answer doesnt change due to it being A for me.
Explanation:
The two reasons:
- Britain intercepted the Zimmerman Telegram
- Germany resumed unrestricted submarine warfare
Context/detail:
Public outrage in the US against the Germans swept the nation following the sinking of the British ocean liner, <em>Lusitania</em> -- but that happened before 1917. When a German U-boat (submarine) sank the Lusitania in May, 1915, over 1,000 persons were killed, including more than 100 Americans. The passenger liner was targeted by the Germans because they suspected weapons were being shipped to Britain in the cargo hold of the ship.
Germany managed to stave off American entry into the war at the time by pledging to stop submarine attacks. But a couple years later they resumed such attacks, and there was also an intercepted telegram (the "Zimmerman Telegram") that showed Germany was trying to secure Mexico as an ally against the United States.
In 1917, the US declared war on Germany in response.
Answer:
Explanation:
Let's examine each quote.
“becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them”
- This states that the colonies need to be independent.
“The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations”
- This quote states that the King (George III) had abused his power and impeded on rights.
“it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government”
- This states that the people are allowed to change or get rid of a government.
“and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer”
- History shows people will suffer.
So, the quote that demonstrates King George III has abused the colonist's right is<u> B. “The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations”
</u>
<span>One way that Rhode Island colony differed from the Massachusetts bay colony was that Rhode Island had religious tolerance. Although only puritans could worship publicly and have sermons and similar, they didn't bother other people of other faiths.</span>
<span />
Answer:
A court today would not find that to be constitutionally valid.
Explanation:
There is a multitude of laws that override the censorship of press, especially to criticize the president. When there are restrictions in free speech, citizens may feel as though they are being dis-empowered. The first amendment allows for free speech, and even if the sitting president feels that it may be harmful, they have no authority to stop free speech.
