Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Tricoteuse is your answer
Answer:
The developments of the Renaissance period changed the course of art in ways that continue to resonate. Interest in humanism transformed the artist from an anonymous craftsman to an individual practicing an intellectual pursuit, enabling several to become the first celebrity artists.
OR
The focus was on the rebirth of classical ideas and artistic works. The works of art of the period often reflect classical themes, including depictions of Greek deities.
Hope this helps<3
The advantage the north has is A-it had more industries, as the union could build guns, ships cannons at a faster and better rate than the south. The other answers just don't make sense as the south grew the most cotton, they both had experienced commanders, and the weather didn't have much effect. I hope this helps!
<span>Iroquois. Which isn't technically a tribe, but a national confederacy comprised of 6 different tribe under a united government.</span>