All categories

2 years ago

1.) In exchange for allowing him to live, what did Sulla take away from Caesar?

History

1 answer:

nekit [7.7K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Well, this is going to be a long answer! I hope I helped, please correct me if I'm wrong!

1. I believe he took Caesar's wife and Cinna’s daughter, in exchange of his life, since research showed that Young Julius Caesar was proscribed for no reason other than he refused to divorce his wife. (I'm not very sure about this)

2. He never married her because Rome, after all, did not recognize plural marriage, and at that time, Caesar was still married to Calpurnia.

3. Caesar focused on economic changes, like improved land and waterways. His political reforms focused on creating physical structures, rebuilding cities and temples, and improving the Senate, The main ruling body in Rome. (I'm sorry about this one, I'm not very sure which one was most important)

4. The senators assassinated Caesar because they feared his unprecedented concentration of power during his dictatorship was undermining the Roman Republic, and presented the deed as an act of tyrannicide.

5. The death of Julius Caesar ultimately had the opposite impact of what his assassins hoped. Much of the Roman public hated the senators for the assassination, and a series of civil wars ensued.

You might be interested in

What was brahmins main role in society

horrorfan [7]

Los brahmanes (castas) forman la primera de las grandes castas hereditarias de la India.

7 0

2 years ago

In which form of government could all citizens participate directly in the government?

Kruka [31]

It would be in a "direct democracy" in which all citizens participate directly in the government, since they would vote on each individual matter directly instead of electing representatives to vote for them.

8 0

2 years ago

How did industrialization in the early 1800s affect women?

Tasya [4]

Weoman began to go school to learn how to trade

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help History questions.

zimovet [89]

Answer:

The two themes I choose:

- Separation of Powers

The "Separation of Powers" states that governmental powers are to be evenly split between "x" amount of branches, x being determined by the Founding Fathers. Each of these branches are given a certain power (or job) that they need to do. For example, The Powers were separated and given to 3 branches:

Executive Branch: This branch is has the power to create a bill, as well as veto, line-veto, give ideas on what to change in a bill, create diplomatic relations with countries, ask congress to start wars, set up Judicial Judges.

Legislative Branch: This branch has the power to create bills, pass the bill, declare war, regulate commerce, control taxation and spending policies, veto or approve Judicial Judges.

Judicial Branch: This branch has the power to impeach Presidents, declare a law or bill as unconstitutional, have the last word on cases that reaches the Supreme Court.

- Checks and Balances

As stated above, there are 3 branches. Each of these branches (I will reiterate what i said) have the powers over the other, so as to not be able to overstep their bounds. Think of it as a triangle, in which they have more power and less power than the others.

Executive Branch:

Powers:

Veto/Pass Bills

Instate Judges

Start relations with other countries

Weakness:

Can be impeached

Veto can be overturned by Congress; Bills passed can be overturned by the Supreme Court

Must ask Congress to start wars if relations turn sour

Legislative Branch:

Powers:

Able to pass laws

Able to declare war

Able to regulate country and foreign commerce

Able to control taxes and how the government spends its funds

Weakness:

Congressmen & women can be replaced

Laws passed can be vetoed/declared unconstitutional

Judicial Branch:

Powers:

Life long term if appointed unless... (which would be put in weakness)

Able to declare laws unconstitutional

Able to have final word in how laws would be interpreted

Weaknesses:

Judges can be replaced

Rulings can be changed if the law is changed later on

4 0

2 years ago

Laws that enforced racial segregation were known as what? A. Bell laws B. Jim Crow laws C. Reconstruction laws D. Reconstruction

xxTIMURxx [149]

B. Jim Crow laws

Jim Crow laws were a series of restrictions on black civil rights that enforced racial segregation in the United States. They were enacted especially in the Southern States of America through almost a century, from 1877 to the beginning of the Civil Right Movement in the 1950s,

The statutes prohibited African American to attend and be in certain places where White people were, such as neighborhoods, restrooms, building entrances, elevators, cemeteries, amusement-park, cashier windows, churches, hospitals, jails, universities, etc.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers