1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
4 years ago
15

Question 3 (1 point)

History
1 answer:
Sphinxa [80]4 years ago
5 0

B) travel back in time, cook food, and win a prize

You might be interested in
What is primary source important in the study of history?​
nikklg [1K]

Answer: Primary sources help students relate in a personal way to events of the past and promote a deeper understanding of history as a series of human events. Because primary sources are snippets of history, they encourage students to seek additional evidence through research.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The decades around the year 50 BC saw the end of the Roman Republic, and the rise of the Roman Empire. What factors led to the d
dem82 [27]

The aristocracy (wealthy class) dominated the early Roman Republic. In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote.

Tradition dictated that patricians and plebeians should be strictly separated; marriage between the two classes was even prohibited. Over time, the plebeians elected their own representatives, called tribunes, who gained the power to veto measures passed by the senate.

Gradually, the plebeians obtained even more power and eventually could hold the position of consul. Despite these changes, though, the patricians were still able to use their wealth to buy control and influence over elected leaders.

The Roman Senate

The history of the Roman Senate goes as far back as the history of Rome itself. It was first created as a 100-member advisory group for the Roman kings. Later kings expanded the group to 300 members. When the kings were expelled from Rome and the Republic was formed, the Senate became the most powerful governing body. Instead of advising the head of state, it elected the chief executives, called consuls.

Senators were, for centuries, strictly from the patrician class. They practiced the skills of rhetoric and oratory to persuade other members of the ruling body. The Senate convened and passed laws in the curia, a large building on the grounds of the Roman Forum. Much later, Julius Caesar built a larger curia for an expanded Senate.

By the 3rd century B.C.E., Rome had conquered vast territories, and the powerful senators sent armies, negotiated terms of treaties, and had total control over the financial matters of the Republic.

Senatorial control was eventually challenged by Dictator Sulla around 82 B.C.E. Sulla had hundreds of senators murdered, increased the Senate's membership to 600, and installed many nonpatricians as senators. Julius Caesar raised the number to 900 (it was reduced after his assassination). After the creation of the Roman Empire in 27 B.C.E., the Senate became weakened under strong emperors who often forcefully coerced this ruling body. Although it survived until the fall of Rome, the Roman Senate had become merely a ceremonial body of wealthy, intelligent men with no power to rule.

Occasionally, an emergency situation (such as a war) arose that required the decisive leadership of one individual. Under these circumstances, the Senate and the consuls could appoint a temporary dictator to rule for a limited time until the crisis was resolved. The position of dictator was very undemocratic in nature. Indeed, a dictator had all the power, made decisions without any approval, and had full control over the military.

The best example of an ideal dictator was a Roman citizen named Cincinnatus. During a severe military emergency, the Roman Senate called Cincinnatus from his farm to serve as dictator and to lead the Roman army. When Cincinnatus stepped down from the dictatorship and returned to his farm only 15 days after he successfully defeated Rome's enemies, the republican leaders resumed control over Rome.

The early Roman Republic often found itself in a state of constant warfare with its surrounding neighbors. In one instance, when the Romans were fighting the Carthaginians, Rome was nearly conquered. The people of Carthage (a city in what is today Tunisia in north Africa) were a successful trading civilization whose interests began to conflict with those of the Romans.

The two sides fought three bloody wars, known as the Punic Wars (264-146 B.C.E.), over the control of trade in the western Mediterranean Sea. In the second war, Hannibal, a Carthaginian general, successfully invaded Italy by leading an army — complete with elephants — across the Alps. He handed the Roman army a crushing defeat but was unable to sack the city of Rome itself. After occupying and ravaging Italy for more than a decade, Hannibal was finally defeated by the Roman general Scipio at the Battle of Zama in 202 B.C.E. Hope You Like My Answer!:)


3 0
3 years ago
50 points**
Aleksandr [31]

It was a smart idea, yes. But if you think about, it wasn't too wise. Smallpox did kill the Native American's but it also spread and killed the colonists.

4 0
4 years ago
How did Lincoln show generosity to white southerners at the expense of African Americans during Reconstruction?
alisha [4.7K]
<span>He was willing to grant pardons to former Confederate's, and he considered compensating them for lost property. In addition, Lincoln did not require a guarantee of social or political equality for African-Americans. He recognize prounion governments in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Tennessee even though they denied African-Americans the right to vote</span>
5 0
3 years ago
1. How does Stanton defi ne the "social revolution" the United States underwent after the Civil War?
lina2011 [118]

Answer: Social revolution by Stanton is a revolution that affected the very foundation of the society and it is very important than both Religious revolution and political revolution.

Stanton believe that individual freedom can be achieved in a family through individual judgment.

Explanation: Stanton believes in the impact of social revolution and sees it as more important by both the Religious revolution and political revolution. In his view social revolution affects the least person of society so it impact is felt by all not as political or Religious revolution which are only felt by parts of society.

To Stanton,self/individual judgements is the only way to achieve individual freedom in a family.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which dynasty did the jews form after rebelling against greek rule
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these men was a young Irishman who defended the colonial cause in Parliament?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the Founding Fathers include the Bill of Rights with the Constitution?
    8·2 answers
  • Location of nasa headquarters
    13·2 answers
  • Jefferson's term of office was not quite the "revolution" he later remembered. True False
    5·1 answer
  • How did japan change after world war II
    13·2 answers
  • Three explorers who started successful new world colonies
    5·1 answer
  • According to feudal custom, landowner called lords gave plots of land to nobles, or vassals. in return, the vassal paid taxes an
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a result of xenophobia in the 1920s
    13·2 answers
  • Who fought in the French and Indian War?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!