The answer is: top; bottom
Explanation:
A study by Great Places to Work, a research and consulting firm, highlights the benefits of breaking down boundaries to get all employees interested in innovative opportunities. Firms in the “top” quartile on the inclusiveness rankings had experienced growth, on average, five times greater than firms ranked in the “bottom” quartile.
The answer to the statement is yes. It is because laws are important to promote fairness and peace. Laws are established to get things done in order and in different places and environment, there are different laws to be followed in which the statement above is related to it.
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
As we know that the license is been provided that serves alcohol for on-premise consumption and gets less than 50% of its gross receipts from alcohol sales, a cashier can be less than 18 years as well, according to the establishment. The establishment clearly mentions that it acquires less than 50 percent of its total receipts and a cashier can be less than 18 years. The given statements are true.
The characteristics of a high-performance work system approach to HRM are-
- Focuses on collective levels of human and social capital
- Enhances the performance of all employees systematically
- Improves employee motivation and opportunities
Among the trends that are occurring in today's high-performance work systems are reliance on knowledge workers, empowerment of employees to make decisions, and the use of teamwork.
A high-performance work system is a bundle of HRM practices designed to promote employees' skills, motivation and involvement to enable a firm to gain a sustainable competitive advantage (Datta et al., 2005; Guthrie, 2001; Huselid, 1995), which includes employment security, extensive training, teams and decentralized
The phrase 'high-performance human resources' (HPHR) is generally taken to refer to human resource management (HRM) practices that have positive effects on the performance of an enterprise, typically a business enterprise.
Learn more about high-performance test here: brainly.com/question/1532968
#SPJ4
Answer: In year three the preferred stockholders would receive $7,000 and the common stockholders would receive $25,000.
Explanation: Preferred stockholders are always paid before common stockholders. Since this stock in cumulative it means that when there is not enough income in one year to pay the preferred stock then the company needs to pay them when they have the money in the future.
In this case the preferred stock is 5% of $100 par value and is cumulative. This means that every year the company needs to pay 5% times $100 par value on each stock, and there is 1,000 shares, so the total is $5,000 in preferred stock dividends.
In year one and two they did not declare enough dividends to pay this full amount. In year one they declared $2,000 and year two they declared $6,000. At the end of year two they should have received $10,000, but only received $8,000. In year three they need to pay the preferred stockholders the $2,000 that are in arrears, plus the $5,000 for year three, for a total of $7,000. Since there was $32,000 in dividends declared and $7,000 is going to the preferred stockholders, it means that there is $25,000 left for the common stockholders. $25,000/10,000 shares equals $2.50 dividend per share.