<span>Which of the following best describes how auto insurance companies manage risk? Auto insurance companies will charge rates based on what they think is appropriate in regards to how likely you are to file a claim. They take into account many factors that will relate to filing a claim in the future and what you have done in the past. By evaluating these, they are determining the risk and how to manage it. </span>
Corporations.
Corporations have an independent legal identity, and even though they aren't people they can be sued in court just like an individual person would.
Answer:
Quasi Contract:
In the case of Lindquist Ford, Inc. v. Middleton Motors, Inc., 557 F.3d 469 (7th Cir. 2009) the trial court settled money damages to Lindquist. The Court of Appeals reversed the result that the trial court had mismanaged the mutual law theories of quantum meruit and unjust augmentation and imprisoned for a new trial. The trial court settled damages to Lindquist and Miller for Miller's salary.
Explanation:
The necessities to improve on the quasi-contract theory are as follows:
- The party looking for damages discussed a benefit on the other party.
- That party also discussed the benefit with the sensible expectation of being paid.
- The party was not performing as a volunteer in providing this benefit.
- The party getting the benefit would be irrationally enriched if permitted to retain the benefit without disbursing for it.
All of these necessities must be encountered in order for a quasi-contract judgment to be awarded.
The necessities under unjust improvement are as follows:
- A benefit discussed upon the perpetrator by the plaintiff.
- Appreciation by the respondent of the fact of such benefit.
- Acceptance and retention by the respondent of the benefit, under conditions such that it would be discriminatory to retain the advantage without payment of the worth thereof.
Lindquist met the essentials required for unjust enhancement and the court fund in their favor.
The necessities under quantum merit are as follows:
- The complainant must prove that the respondent requested the plaintiff's services.
- It was reasonable for the applicant to expect reimbursement for the services. Lindquist met the elements compulsory for quantum meruit and the court found in their favor.
The condition most likely to be doubtful in this case is whether or not the party seeking compensations actually discussed a benefit upon the other party, or whether Lindquist essentially conferred a benefit upon Middleton through the management of Miller. The court resolute through indication presented that Lindquist and Miller had a reasonable anticipation to payment for services rendered and that Middleton received a benefit from Miller's services
<span>The embargo created an artificial drop in the supply of oil. How would a natural shortage differ from an embargo situation? A natural shortage of oil may lead to more people being cautious of how they spend their energy. This may also drive new ways for us to obtain energy. An embargo is a ban on a trade or commercial activity within a specific country. Different countries can put an embargo on a product that another one needs and it can hurt their overall economy and living situations. </span>
Answer: Knowledge
Explanation: IDRC engages in expertise, creativity, and strategies to increase the quality of life in developing countries as a segment of Canada's international affairs and development activities. IDRC aims to address realistic development issues with the brilliant minds in Canada and across the globe.
In addition to promoting global stability and development, partnering with local academic institutions and financing agencies effectively decreases reliance on assistance while establishing political leadership.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the primary focus in the program is on knowledge.