1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dexar [7]
3 years ago
6

How did the economic philosophy of mercantilism slow economic growth before the Industrial Revolution?

History
2 answers:
sergeinik [125]3 years ago
3 0
It prevented merchants from freely trading goods in foreign markets. apex//
slava [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The economic philosophy of mercantilism decelerated economic growth, prior to the Industrial Revolution, by adopting prohibitive measures of trade with foreign markets.

Explanation:

Mercantilism is the name given to a set of economic practices developed in Europe in the Modern Age, between the fifteenth century and the end of the eighteenth century. Mercantilism originated a set of diverse economic measures according to the States. It was characterized by a strong state intervention in the economy. It consisted of a series of measures aimed at unifying the internal market and aimed at the formation of strong national states.

The mercantilist economic philosophy led the sovereigns to make concessions to the entrepreneurs. In this sense, they intensified the creation of new manufactures, they defended the national fabrications, thus stipulating rates and measures prohibitive to the free trade of foreign products. They also took care of the favorable trade balance and developed companies focused on colonial exploration.

You might be interested in
This is really easy
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

i know it

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a function of state or local government, but NOT of the national government?
zalisa [80]

what are the multiple choice options to the question?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would it benefit a company to restrict its supply of a product to consumers when consumer demand for the product is high?
motikmotik
The main reason why it would benefit a company to restrict its supply of a product to consumers when consumer demand for the product is high is because the prices are higher. 
3 0
3 years ago
Did the Native Americans believe that acquiring possessions was an important goal?
ohaa [14]

Answer:

Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help pls!
horrorfan [7]
I hope this help to be honest and U can just search it up online

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are two lasting legacies of Portugal’s history?
    11·2 answers
  • In the early part of the Industrial Revolution, power was provided by _____. people flowing water horses steam
    9·1 answer
  • In thanksgiving proclamation, Washington excepts people to use November 26 as a day to what?
    10·2 answers
  • How do lines of latitude and longitude help you locate places on earth surface with greater accuracy?
    8·1 answer
  • Worcester v. Georgia showed the limitations of the Constitution's provisions for checks and balances because ____.
    6·2 answers
  • Which indian tribe was pursued 1,100 miles and forced to surrender just south of the canadian border in 1877?
    9·1 answer
  • Finding traitors against the revolution was the job of the ?
    9·2 answers
  • Determine which phrases relate to the kingdoms of Mall, Songhai, or both
    14·1 answer
  • How did the scholastic universities impact the late medieval period
    10·1 answer
  • Read historian Doris Kearns Goodwin’s essay on Franklin Delano Roosevelt's character. Then identify three traits that she believ
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!