The British. Because they promised them that they would limit the colonist westward migration. (Which they did not follow through with)
The ships were built well but they cramp packed the slaves in the hull of the ship so if one person was sick the rest did too
Historians affect history because the bias of historians will affect the way that they record events.
Whether intentional or unintentional, many historians include bias in their writing when recording events. Bias is your personal beliefs or attitudes skewed for or against a topic that influence your writing. If a historian includes this in their writing about an event, it can change the way that the event is perceived by the public. Many historians relay the facts in a similar manner, but it is the bias that makes their stories unique from one another and also how they affect history.
Hope this helps!
<span>This question was not asked clearly. What I do know from what I can understand, the whole point of separation of powers is to clearly divide the responsibilities between the three branches.</span>
The federal judicial system promotes the constitutional principle of rule of law by ensuring that the laws passed by congress are fairly applied to all citizens.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
While constituting the federal judicial system the congress as created rule of law that will be applicable to all the citizens of America.
Federal courts are courts that are created by the federal government which has limited powers that is, the power are limited to particular region or you can call it courts of limited jurisdiction.
The courts within the states are called as federal district court and it is originating point for any case in the federal statutes. The ambit of rule of Law promoted by the federal judicial system will have constitutional binding for all the citizens of America.
