Prominent farmer robbed and killed

GalinKa [24]

the poem above is a sonnet

3 0

2 years ago

The poem "The Raven by Edgar Allan Poe, the raven repeats the word nevermore in response to the speaker's question. What effect

alexgriva [62]

The effect that this response has on the speaker is that the speaker’s mental state shifts more and more toward madness.
The raven is constantly repeating the same word - nevermore. In the beginning, the narrator just thought it was a weird coincidence that the bird should say that one single word, but as time passes by, the weight of that word becomes unbearable as the narrator realizes that this word can be applied to all of his questions. So as time goes by, the narrator becomes more and more depressed about not being allowed to see his beloved and thus he falls into madness.

6 0

3 years ago

Who is the first human in the world?

Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Adam (religiously)

or Lucy (scientifically; there wasn't really a first human, but if you had to come up with someone, this is what might be considered correct, as it is the earliest remains)

Explanation:

religiously [Judaism/Christianity], the first person is believed to be Adam, created by G*d.

scientifically (based on fossil records and theories of evolution), there was no first "human", or, at least, not in the way you're thinking of.

people, like all other organisms, have evolved from a very distant ancestor. This is called a common ancestor, and it is theorized to be shared by all organisms/life on earth [not the same as plants]. However, this ancestor is not even remotely human, it was likely no more than a worm-like creature.

Over time, different versions of this animal started evolving, and eventually, a species (which began to resemble humans as we see them now). Early Australopithecus would probably be the first "humans"--although, they were not really humans. These were in existence 1-5 million years ago. (This is when religion does not line up with science--we have fossil remains of Australopithecus, and they are not nearly what Adam is described as from a religious perspective, there is literally no possible way for a human to have been that evolved the same amount of time ago-

**This is why I believe that religious texts are theoretical, and were never written to be facts, they were stories that helped people understand morals. I am somewhat religious)

I digress. So, over time, these old distant versions of humans, that were really, really, different from humans evolved. This is why there is no first human, we evolved together.

One of the earliest recorded "humans" was Lucy, an Australopithecus. We don't believe her to be the first human scientifically, because there could be no first human--our existence is evolution, and there is no start to human history--it begins from a place that was not humans.

So, there was no first human, only the earliest recordings of one (which is what we often simplify to be the first human)

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following provides the best example of irony based on historic fact

Gelneren [198K]

Nicely, it relies upon. while you're speaking with regard to the historic past of a particular united states, subculture, or region, the dividing line could be a particular adventure that got here approximately in the time of that century. while you're speaking approximately England, as an occasion, "as much as the early seventeenth century" could desire to comprise in simple terms the 1st few years of the century, till 1603, while Queen Elizabeth died. or you may desire to assert that each thing up till the outbreak of the English Civil conflict in 1642 grew to become into "early seventeenth century." in spite of while you're in fact speaking approximately England (or the different particular united states/subculture) it easily relies upon on what you're speaking approximately -- what's a logical or functional slicing-off component to your subject remember.

4 0

2 years ago

Can you name any dystopian moivies ?

kipiarov [429]

Answer:

The hunger games

Explanation: The hunger games is based on a dystopian future.

It is a dystopian movie because it depicts a future where things are far worse than they are now, because of the choices we make. Everyone is suffering.

7 0

2 years ago