Answer: Escaped slaves were sometimes able to form communities that gave them some degree of protection from recapture.
They were Gahandi and Henry David Thoreau
Answer:
These colonies were also different. There was <u>more religious freedom in the Middle colonies</u> than in the New England colonies. This was especially true in Pennsylvania. The <u>Middle colonies had some slaves while the New England colonies had very few slaves</u>. This is true because there was <u>more large scale farming in the southern part of the Middle colonies where the soil was more fertile and the climate more suited for farming</u>. Thus, another difference is the <u>kind of farming</u> done. In the <u>New England colonies</u>, <u>subsistence farming was practiced</u>. These<u> farmers grew enough for their family, but didn’t have too much left to sell to other people</u>. In the <u>Middle colonies, farmers grew crops for sale</u>. The main cash crop was wheat.
Based on the quote, critics of NAFTA might have claimed that:
A) Mexican workers would be unfairly taken advantage of
<h3>What can be deduced about the critics of NAFTA from the text?</h3>
The critics of NAFTA believe that Mexico was not as strong as the other countries who entered the trade agreement so the possibility that they will be taken advantage of was there.
Having read the above statement from the 1993 agreement of NAFTA, we can see that the reference to the United Mexican states must have proved that the union was needed to stand side by side with the American and Canadian states.
Critics might have believed that Mexico was vulnerable and could be unfairly taken advantage of in the deal.
Learn more about NAFTA here:
brainly.com/question/27372794
#SPJ1
The weakness of the Byzantine Empire was a major contributor to the expansion of Ottoman rule. Another reason for the success of the Ottomans is tied to religion. The subjects of the Ottoman Empire were devout Muslims and they believed they were on a mission to expand Islam.
