Answer:
By using parallelism in line 3, the author places importance on the concept of equality.
Explanation:
In this excerpt, parallelism is being used in line 3. This is because both phrases in line 3 have the same grammatical structure, and they both start with the word "equal" ("equal access, equal justice"). The most likely reason why the author decided to write this line in this way is because he wanted the reader to pay attention to the concept of equality.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
all of them just arent finished
1. The teacher had to constrain the class.
2. The war was contemporary.
3. They had to depict for the class presentation.
4. He was disintetrested in the event.
5. They had to encompass their favourite subjects in a mood board.
6. The thing he did was completely groundless.
7. She was a hypocrite, always pretending to like people she hang out with.
8. She found the things in the maths class completely incompressible.
9. She managed to manipulate him into doing something with her lies.
10. He had a lot of stamina so he was always ready for anything in a p.e. lesson.
I say talk about economic policy. Argue for a position you believe in (be it Socialism, Laissez-Faire Capitalism, or whatever). I would start by using a anecdote that described the issue using the negative consequences of embracing the other perspective, immediately tarnishing the person's first impression of the opposite ideology. Then, I would involve logos by saying things like "just think about it, and you'll realize it makes perfect sense" and explaining my position as though it were a formula. Ethos would come into the picture when I mention the opinions of professionals and scholars who I've hand=picked to agree with me on the topic. Pathos has already been used in the form of the beginning anecdote, a "sob story" so to speak.
Hope that I helped!
Answer:
double quotation marks (“ and ”)
Explanation:
<u>In cases when someone else’s words and writings are cited and quoted word for word, a writer should use double quotation marks (" ") around the said passage. </u>This is evidence to the reader that words used between the marks are not of that writer but someone else.
This has to be done in order to credit the original author of the quote. When double quotation marks and citations are not put in the essay or text, it is considered to be plagiarism, stealing someone else's work and presenting it as your own.
