In this item, it can be seen that from an expression of,
(4 + 5i) + (-3 + 7i)
Aiko transformed the equation by factoring out the i's from the expression and wrote it as,
(4 + 5)i + (-3 + 7)i
Now this is wrong because i there is not a variable but a notation that 5 and 7 are imaginary numbers. In fact, she cannot factor out the i's because it is not present in both -3 and 4. The answer therefore to this item is the last sentence, "Aiko incorrectly used the distributive property by combining ..."
Step-by-step explanation:
m<6 + 63 = 180
m<6= 180-63
m<6= 117°
m<7 and m<3 are corresponding angles. They match
m<7= 63°
The first or second answer
Answer:
200,000
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this, you can divide the 2019 total projected employment (210,000) by 1 + the growth rate (.05) to find the 2009 total employment.
210,000 / (1 + .05) = 200,000
I hope this helps!
-TheBusinessMan