<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the best options would be the expansion of the media and more immigration, since both of these things lead to a "diffusion" of cultures. </span></span>
Answer:
Difficult for him to deal with
Answer:
is :The North opposed the extension of slavery into new states.
Explanation:
Patronage ( which held a very similar meaning to favouritism) ,
will make our society controlled by those who are not genuinely care for others and very unsuitable to be in charge. Because of this, the government policies that made usually tend to benefit only small number of upperclass people
hope this helps
Answer: i hope this helps i think its to long but just copy what you need
A League of Nations mandate was a legal status for certain territories transferred from the control of one country to another following World War I, or the legal instruments that contained the internationally agreed-upon terms for administering the territory on behalf of the League of Nations. These were of the nature of both a treaty and a constitution, which contained minority rights clauses that provided for the rights of petition and adjudication by the International Court.[1]
The mandate system was established under Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, entered into force on 28 June 1919. With the dissolution of the League of Nations after World War II, it was stipulated at the Yalta Conference that the remaining Mandates should be placed under the trusteeship of the United Nations, subject to future discussions and formal agreements. Most of the remaining mandates of the League of Nations (with the exception of South-West Africa) thus eventually became United Nations Trust Territories.
Two governing principles formed the core of the Mandate System, being non-annexation of the territory and its administration as a “sacred trust of civilization” to develop the territory for the benefit of its native people.[2]
