Answer:
A. have permission from the government.
B. face a downward-sloping demand curve.
C. set price equal to marginal cost.
D. be sure the price-marginal cost ratio is the same for all its submarkets.
Explanation:
Answer:
a) Spaghetti
Explanation:
Dollar value means the actual amount raised from selling. In this case,
spaghetti will have dollar sales of:
=340 x $12
=$4,080
Steak
=212 x $16
=$3,392
Therefore, spaghetti has higher dollar sales.
Part a) The Cob Douglas production function is given as:
To show that this function is homogeneous with degree 3, we introduce be a parameter, t.
Using properties of exponents, we on tinder:
This implies that:
Simplify the exponent of t to get;
Hence the function is homogeneous with degree, 3
Part b) To verify Euler's Theorem, we must show that:
Verifying from the left:
Q•E•D
Answer & Explanation: Lena would respond to the buyer's request of wanting a house in the Cuban neighborhood by explaining to her that legally and ethically, she cannot provide housing recommendations based on national origin as it is a form of housing discrimination which is enshrined in the Fair Housing Act. The Act can take several forms, one of which is discrimination based on national origin.
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
