1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
son4ous [18]
3 years ago
6

Is the following shape a rectangle? how do you know?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Usimov [2.4K]3 years ago
8 0
Slope of AB =  1/3 and slope of  BC = -3    so these 2 lines are perpendicular
The same is true for all the other adjjacent pairs of lines.
Oppoitse lines are also paralllel (  slope of AB = 1/3 and slope of  DC = 1/3)  and other pair are both of slope -3.

So Its C
You might be interested in
Maggie has $14,100 to invest, and wishes to gain $4,000 in interest over the next eight years. Approximately what is the minimum
julsineya [31]
Simple interest doesn't compound, so we just find the interest she needs by dividing 4,000 by 8, and then divide that number by her principal to find the rate of interest. 

4,000 ÷ 8 = 500
She needs 500 dollars per year in interest. 

800 ÷ 14,100 = .0355 = 3.55%

Answer is B
3 0
3 years ago
Brainliest to the answer. please help !
11111nata11111 [884]
The answer is C because when you rotate 90 degrees clockwise (x,y) becomes (y,-x)
6 0
2 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
The sides of a rectangle are scaled to be 1/4 of their original size
Advocard [28]
The answer is in fact D
5 0
3 years ago
Can anybody help me?
Sloan [31]

Answer:

7⅓

Step-by-step explanation:

2 ÷ 3⁄11 → 2 × 3⅔ >> 7⅓

Dividing by a fraction is the exact same as multiplying by its multiplicative inverse.

* 3⅔ = 11⁄3

* 7⅓ = 22⁄3

I am joyous to assist you anytime.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the value of X, can someone help me?
    9·1 answer
  • Find the unknown value 16 is 40% of ???
    6·2 answers
  • Which equation shows a line that is parallel to the line
    9·1 answer
  • An office supply store carriers a all-in-one printer with a regular price of $240. The printer is on sale at 15% off. In additio
    12·1 answer
  • Pls pls pls tell me what is the correct answer?
    10·1 answer
  • In a field
    9·1 answer
  • How do I do this? <br> I need to simplify the answers
    11·2 answers
  • I need help with math homework
    11·1 answer
  • Estimate the total number of hairs on your head. To calculate your estimate, you must make assumptions
    8·1 answer
  • 1, 2,5,6,9,...<br> what’s the pattern
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!