It was the constitutional principle of <span>(1) States rights that led to the the civil war, but in reality the civil war was really about the issue of the expansion of slavery.</span>
Portugal is the European Kingdom that led in European Exploration in the 15th Century in the age of discovering, exploration and mapping coasts of Africa, Canada, Asia and Africa. Under the leadership of Prince Henry the Navigator, Portugal took the role to search for a sea route to Asia by sailing south around Africa, and during this process, Portugal accumulated wealthy knowledge on the geography and navigation of the Atlantic ocean.
In the last decade, Christopher Columbus crossed the Atlantic Ocean and "discovered" a new continent while searching or a sea route to the Indies.
In 1498, Vasco da Gama led the first fleet around Africa to India.
Answer:
<u>1. Formation of the British East India Company (December 31, 1600)</u>
<u>2. The Sepoy rebellion (May 10th, 1857)</u>
<u>3. Establishment of the British Raj (June 28, 1858)</u>
Explanation:
<u>1. British East India Company:</u> It was a society that obtained on December 31, 1600 the blessing of Queen Elizabeth I of England with the intention of guaranteeing the privileges of trade in India. This royal authorization gave the new company the monopoly of all trade in the East Indies.
The company was transformed, from a simple commercial union, to become the company that virtually governed India and had under its power almost a fifth of the world's population at that time.
<u>2. The Sepoy rebellion: </u>It was a consequence of the different events that had happened during the process of British domination with the East India Company. The British Empire dealt with coercing the kingdoms of India against the Mughal Empire in order to destabilize it.
<u>3. Establishment of the British Raj: </u>It was the law of the British Crown in the Indian subcontinent since 1858. The region was under British control and included areas directly administered by the United Kingdom, which together were called "British India", and those that were ruled by Indian kings, although under British tutelage they were called Princely States.
The following heads of government or heads of state formally suspended provisions of the country's constitution while in office.
There are several periods in the Roman Empire that saw shortages of labour workers. But the one that is most relevant is the fall of the West Roman Empire.
The first reason relates to economic troubles. Decades of battles and wars stripped the Roman Empire of its wealth. Having no supply to compensate for payment, the labour forces of the Roman Empire will eventually fall apart.
Secondly, there was a critical lack of slave supply in the empire. The slaves were conquered people by the Romans from battles and brought under the empire. There they would make use of the slaves by having them work in agricultural, mining, and personal fields. The Romans were heavily depended on their slaves to operate their labours. But once the Roman expansion came to a halt in the 2nd century, there comes no more slaves brought by the military. Soon the slave labour force dwindled and the Romans lost one of their main source of labour.
Lastly, the Roman Empire and it’s citizens was too caught up by outside invasions and political corruptions. There exists a split in the West Roman Empire where the lack of unity accounted for less unified use of labours. More money had to be spent and enlistments had to occur to get more soldiers into the military to defend from outside attackers. Political chaos also contributed to the catastrophic events that led up to the collapse of the Western Roman Empire.
This is only my understanding and interpretation, I hoped it helped tho :)