1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Afina-wow [57]
3 years ago
7

If a bank assumes ownership of a piece of contaminated land

Law
1 answer:
velikii [3]3 years ago
5 0

If a bank assumes ownership of a piece of contaminated land, the bank becomes a responsible party .

Option c

<u> Explanation: </u>

According to the banking norms for getting loan a property has to be attached as a collateral security and agreement of repaying entered between the bank and loanee.

In case of defaulting of loan it is the prerogative of the bank to sell or withheld the property.

So, to recover the loan, bank has the right to sell the attached property which is attached as collateral security even if it is contaminated land. The sole aim of the bank is to recover the loan in case of repayment in which loanee is referred as defaulter.

You might be interested in
Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court lever is called <br>a/an?
Elodia [21]

Answer:

Trevor1984. Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court level is called an appeal

6 0
3 years ago
When threats are used to convince a party to sign a contract, it is known as
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

(A

Explanation:

Explanation in the pic!

Hope this helps!

<em>-kiniwih426</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Minors are generally held liable on a quasi-contract basis for the reasonable value of necessaries provided to them.
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following summarizes the Three-fifths Compromise?
Margarita [4]

A three-fifths compromise is the compromise that has been made by the slaves for the purpose of taxation and representation for a white person.

What is a three-fifths compromise?

A three-fifths compromise is a kind of agreement that has been made between the Northern and Southern state delegates at the U.S. Constitutional Convention (1787). It was mentioned in the agreement that direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives would be done by the three-fifth slaves.

The compete question is attached in the image below.

Thus, three-fifths of the compromise was basically done by slaves for white people.

Learn more about the three-fifths compromise from here:

brainly.com/question/10987562

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Question 1 of 25
timofeeve [1]

In the congressional proposal method, two-thirds of both chambers of Congress must propose an amendment. The proposed amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of state conventions or state legislatures, as chosen by Congress. Diagram of each form of proposing and ratifying an amendment.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Class or individual Evidence?
    8·2 answers
  • Which argument is true for the classical theory of criminology
    9·1 answer
  • Explain consequences of interfering with the right to vote on the rule of law.
    8·2 answers
  • What are the rule of law​
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think a consumer's liability should be different for lost credit cards than for lost debit cards ?
    13·1 answer
  • The five basic traits and skills needed to solve research problems
    6·2 answers
  • Three roles of the local government in development​
    9·1 answer
  • Who presides over any impeachment trial of the president of the united states
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the New World lack trained lawyers and judges?
    7·2 answers
  • SECTION ONE: answer either 1A or 1B 1A Consider the following scenario. Below the scenario, I have provided you with a simple eg
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!