Yeah your argument is correct.
At 18 you can vote, the present-day youth are literate and enlightened and the lowering of the voting age would provide to the unrepresented youth of the country an opportunity to give vent to their feelings and help them become a part of the political process.
It is, therefore, proposed to reduce the voting age from 21 years to 18 years. Hence, the court argument is proved as wrong. 18 have the capability to vote.
They could assign anger management for parent(s) along with making sure the parent(s) are not exposed to/ using drugs and/or alcohol. They could also have an emergency hotline that children of all any age 2-18+ can get to whether it be through phone or some other method. Asking neighbors to call right away if they see/hear anything that could be linked to child abuse. Following the line of emergency hotlines they should have therapist and counselor hotlines running 24/7
(That’s all I got...)
Answer:
different makers and programs
Explanation:
