<u>Answer:</u>
Libertarianism and utilitarianism are in opposition to one another. In utilitarianism, individuals accept that an activity that produces satisfaction is the thing that one ought to go. Utilitarians could not care less whether what they are doing occupies someone else's privileges. While, in libertarianism, an individual's activity for bliss ought not to disregard someone else's rights. Libertarians’ esteem activities that advance reasonableness and equity in the general public dissimilar to the practical actions that now and again damages decency and fairness.
Read the textbook, "World History, Our Human Story" page 90. In this book, there is a small passage that says,
"Some periods of civilization are considered "classical". These are times when a society makes extraordinary achievements in art, science, religion, philosophy, and politics. Classical ages often exert a strong influence over later generations.
The classical periods of the two great Asian civilizations of India and China gave rise to influential religions and philosophical systems- Buddhism, Confucianism, and Daoism. In India, advances in mathematics and astronomy furthered understanding of the way the world works. Both civilizations (India and China) produced artistic and literary works that served as models for hundreds of years and are still studied and admired today.
Please do not copy this word for word, since this is in a textbook that you should have looked over to help figure out the answer. Good luck to you :D
<span>c. africa as slaves.
Historical records indicate that in the 17th century, a few Muslims were brought in from Africa as slaves. They were kidnapped from West Africa and sold into slavery in America. The African slaves were split up from their families and community members which destroyed the structure of the family in which Islam is based.<span>
</span></span>
<h3>The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.</h3>
<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>
