It depends on what penalties, and the severity of the student cheating.
So, the student is cheating on something minor, something unimportant, then I don't think they need to be kicked out of class just for that, but maybe get a 0 on that whole thing and that will teach them a lesson.
If the student is cheating on something important (excluding big tests), then the school should probably: A, give them a 0 on it or B, move them down to a lower level so the student feels like they don't have to cheat.
The worst thing they could do is cheat on a really big test like an exam, then they will probably end up with a big fat 0 on it all and flunk that class, or get kicked out of class.
Lots of people (adults and kids) think that penalties should be easier on the kids, but I don't agree with that. If the kid has done something wrong, then the kid needs to pay for their actions and deal with the consequences.
Answer:
What led to the outbreak of the bloodiest conflict in the history of North America? A common explanation is that the Civil War was fought over the moral issue of slavery. In fact, it was the economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict.
Explanation:
Muhammad's first revelation was according to Islam, was when Gabreil spoke to him in 610 CE. He told him to follow the Quaran, the equivalent to a Bible for christanity
English colonization would save the New World from Spanish tyranny.
Hakluyt posited that England would receive numerous benefits by creating colonies in the Americas. He considered this necessary given what he considered as Spanish tyranny whereby the Spanish forced people forswear and renounce their religion and their loyalty to the Queen
