Below is the excerpt that I managed to check from other source.
<span>Those men who survived—those eager to obey, eager to live for one another, since they had nothing else to vindicate them—those men could neither carry on, nor preserve what they had received. Thus did all thought, all science, all wisdom perish on earth. Thus did men—men with nothing to offer save their great number—lose the steel towers, the flying ships, the power wires, all the things they had not created and could never keep.
Below is the answer:
</span><span>People who prefer collective thought are unable to contribute new ideas to mankind's progress.</span><span>
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. The connection that the narrator make between collectivism and human invention would be that people who prefer collective thought are unable to contribute new ideas to mankind’s progress. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
In the agreement it said he wouldn’t take the Czech into Germany’s territory... but he broke the agreement and then took Czech under the nazis party aka Germany’s government
