Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Add the amounts together:
Convert the whole number 1 into a fraction with denominator 4:
As all the denominators are the same, we can simply add the numerators:
Finally, convert the improper fraction into a mixed number:
Answer:
Based on the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion, there is convincing statistical evidence that he is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion from the sample of people from his party that support the law = 70%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 550 people
The proportion from the sample of people from the other party that support the law = 65%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 420 people
The confidence level of the test = 95%
The given confidence interval for the difference in proportion, C.I. = (-0.010, 0.110)
Given that the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion ranges from -0.010, to 0.110, it is 95% certain that 0 is among the likely difference in proportion between the two populations and therefore, there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the members of either political that support the proposed new traffic law.
Answer:
The answer is soooo simple
Step-by-step explanation:
its c
Answer:
Case1:
Men : 30
Work : 1
Time (day×hr): 56×6 = 336 hr.
Case2:
Men : let it be m men.
Work: 1
Time: 45×7 = 315 hr.
Work being constant in both cases, men and time are in inverse proportion i.e, more men take less time.
Product of men and time is constant in both cases.
Therefore, 30×336=m×315
Or, 30×336/315 = m
Or, m = 32.
Hence, required number of men is 32.
Step-by-step explanation:
