How did the social contract differ from the divine right of kings

1 answer:

5 0

The social contract saw the authority of a ruler coming from the people, whereas the diving right of kings saw a ruler's authority coming from God.

Philosophers of the Enlightenment era were famous for arguing the idea of a "social contract." According to this view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. One of the most influential of the social contract theorists was John Locke, who repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his First Treatise on Civil Government. In his Second Treatise on Civil Government, Locke then argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting and enhancing their own life, liberty, and property.

You might be interested in

What other religions are the Aryans gods similar to?

Ber [7]

Answer:

The other part of the Avesta, yet that have been written on the various deities and pre-owned ... Keywords: Avesta, Rig Veda, Ancient Aryan Gods, mythology,. 1. ... and goddess Anahita Ayzdmhr their religion their way.

5 0

3 years ago

Why did the Federalists support ratification of the Constitution?

ikadub [295]

Answer:

Sounds about right, I don't really understand the context behind this question, assuming it's a opinionated based question.

Explanation:

None available.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who was at the top of the inca social structure? the emperor elected citizens the nobels priests?

sergey [27]

The correct answer is

Emperor (A)

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How does the trip over the falls immediately affect Annie?

Alexandra [31]

There are a lot of people who want to make sure they have money in their later years, so she thought about becoming the first person to ride over Niagara Falls in a barrel.

3 0

2 years ago

How did the economic context of peru impact the decisions made in the tintaya mine endeavor?

KengaRu [80]

The explorations that led to the discovery of Tintaya mine go back to 1917. In 1971, the Peruvian government promoted the exploitation of the mine. In 1980, the expropriation of approximately 4,000 hectares of land, owned by the communities, was carried out. It is for this reason that started a dispute between the commoners and the Company. In 1985 the exploitation of Tintaya began and it became the third producer of the country. In 1994, the mine was bought by Broken Hill Proprietary (BHP), who subsequently merged with the company Billiton, forming the second biggest group in the world production of minerals. In 2001, the first proposal for the framework agreement was made public. An agreement was reached and the framework agreement was consolidated in 2003. The signature of the framework agreement was an innovative milestone. Never before, a mining company had agreed to transfer a percentage of profits to communities and to engage to dialogue with them at all times. In 2005, a violent takeover occurred of the Tintaya facilities. A reformulation of the framework agreement was demanded. The implementation of the framework agreement was taking place very slowly. The president of BHP Billiton had to suspend the mining activity until a new agreement was reached. Then the negotiations began again. Xstrata Cooper (now Glencore) bought Tintaya from BHP Billiton in 2006. The owner changed, but the same conflicts and mobilizations continued until 2012. The last stoppage lasted eight days. During this paralysis, violent acts occurred and even the mine was asked to close, which was completely rejected by the government. Finally, at present, no resolution or reformulation of the framework agreement has been reached.

3 0

3 years ago