1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natali 33 [55]
3 years ago
15

A problem for the national government under the articles of confederation was that apex

History
2 answers:
eimsori [14]3 years ago
8 0

The Articles of Confederation supported the Continental Army and allowed the Thirteen States to form a united front before the European powers. However, as a tool to build an effective government in times of war, it was a failure. Congress could make decisions, but did not have the power to apply them. Perhaps, the biggest setback was the requirement of unanimous approval of the 13 States to modify the articles. At the same time, the most important power that Congress lacked was the power to collect taxes: it could only request money from the States. These, for their part, did not always comply with the demands and Congress did not have the necessary funds for its operation. States and Congress had become indebted during the war, and the payment of debts was a matter of national importance.

Since the war against Great Britain was still going on, the settlers did not want to establish another powerful national government. With the mistrust to protect its new independence, the Continental Congress created a weak unicameral structure that protected the freedom of the member states. After the end of the War of Independence and the beginning of new priorities, its limitations became evident. This document was replaced by the Constitution of the United States after its ratification on June 21, 1788.

zvonat [6]3 years ago
6 0
No provisions were made for an executive branch to enforce the laws nor for a national court system to interpret them. A legislative Congress was the sole organ of the national government, but it had no power to force the states to do anything against their will.
You might be interested in
Use this panel to write one paragraph to explain whether or not you think the Declaration of Independence upholds the political
Likurg_2 [28]
The Decleration of Independence does uphold the political principles because with out it or country would still be suffering for the lack of money and freedom because of Europe's greed. For example, imagine the U.S. becoming a country like South Africa. We would be poor and helpless because we would have no independence and the right to agree to trading and developing a economic system in general. So my overall arguement stands to show that I support the Decleration of Independence and that it upholds all of Americans political values.
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following actions were not undertaken during Lewis and Clark's expedition of the northern and western areas of the
Zinaida [17]

Answer: The Lewis and Clark Expedition began in 1804, when President Thomas Jefferson ... with exploring lands west of the Mississippi River that comprised the Louisiana Purchase. The expedition provided new geographic, ecological and social information about previously uncharted areas of North America.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What piece of US legislation restricted the rights of cub and after their independence from Spain
notka56 [123]
The answer is the bill of rights
7 0
3 years ago
The battle of fallen timbers saw the increase of large tracts of land secured from native americans in the future state of
Trava [24]
<span>The Battle of Fallen Timbers was a crucial battle between colonists and the British in the Northwest Territory. Ultimately, given that it was before the creation of the state, the present day geographical location of this battle occurred in the state that would later become Ohio.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Stark's own research demonstrates that the more frequently people attended religious service- either Protestant or Catholic- the
Yakvenalex [24]

The correct answer is TRUE.

Both Catholic and Protestan christian faiths consider that stealing another person's properties is a sin, an inadequate behaviour for which belivers need to ask for forgiveness to God.

In this line, people who frequently attend the religious services connected to the abovementioned faiths, will more likely implement the ideas of the religion in their life, their choices and their opinions than others. Therefore, it is quite probable that they will not support selling or buying stolen goods.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Answer the following questions in Discussion under Roots of Evil
    5·1 answer
  • Why was D-Day a turning point in WWII? What changed as a result of D-Day
    13·1 answer
  • When did hitler comes to power in germany?
    5·1 answer
  • The policy or practice of taking lands to increase the size of a country:
    8·1 answer
  • Why did many europeans criticize the the catholic church
    10·1 answer
  • According to the federal election commission, what is one action that a national party committee must preform hold a national co
    6·1 answer
  • Which was NOT an advantage George Washington and his army used during the American Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • A term the represents the working class
    15·1 answer
  • What do you think will be the biggest problem the United States will face in your lifetime?
    14·2 answers
  • Underline and number the problems that the early English settlers encountered in Roanoke and Jamestown. Consider how colonists c
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!