The simple answer to your complex question is NO. This is assuming that you live in a country where there are good laws (remember that history is full of bad governments that implemented bad laws) and that law enforcement is effective. Simplisticly, you should only ask yourself this question when your or your families life is being threatened and law enforcement is not around. Your response must still be within the constraints of your laws or you will find yourself in hot water. I'm not even going to try to discuss the ethics and morals that can apply as the situation can vary immensely. Keep it simple - don't operate outside the law, rather fight against unjust laws.
Answer:
A beating is far less severe than torture and mutilation.
Explanation:
Torture is far more extensive and does more damage as well as increases the chance greatly of psychological damage. Mutilation is also way too harsh due to the same facts.
Answer:
18. Eugenics is the set of beliefs of practices which apparently aims to help the I quote "genetic quality" of the human population. But although, it sounds bad,it played a significant role in back then's history and its culture.
22.
Explanation: (Conservation of natural resources, Control of corporations, and Consumer protection.) Because of Roosevelt's policies, national wild lands would be taken care of for their national resources, protecting them.
I think it is <span>indifference.</span>
All three were Anti Semitic. Ford was especially firm in his beliefs. He forced his dealerships to give out pamphlets that denounced Jews in ways that are not to be believed. Oddly enough it didn't keep people from buying Fords. By and large, antisemitism was an accepted opinion in the 1920s and 1930s
Although Ford recanted his beliefs, Lindbergh never did. He hated all that were not Aryan. He is better classified as white supremacist.
Charles Conklin was a Roman Catholic priest who was one of the first to use the radio as a communication device. His political views were not appreciated by Roosevelt and others who felt he should be commenting only on religion. He was banned after Pearl Harbor.
