Answer:
a) After the French and Indian War, the end of the western wilderness infuriated numerous homesteaders with wants to grow west for exchange and cultivating.
b) The homesteaders were angry towards the British because of unreasonable tax collection through the Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, Tea Act, and Intolerable Acts without portrayal in the British Parliament.
c) As a reaction to expanded pioneer carrying, the British issues a writ of help which gave any British authority the option to look through pilgrim ships without a warrant.
Explanation:
a) After the French and Indian War, the end of the western wilderness infuriated numerous homesteaders with wants to grow west for exchange and cultivating.
b) The homesteaders were angry towards the British because of unreasonable tax collection through the Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, Tea Act, and Intolerable Acts without portrayal in the British Parliament. They defied the British with the call to war "no imposing taxes without any political benefit," which filled the incensed pilgrims' progressive thoughts.
c) As a reaction to expanded pioneer carrying, the British issues a writ of help which gave any British authority the option to look through pilgrim ships without a warrant. Besides, any settlers found sneaking would be submit to an office of the chief naval officer court which had no jury. The utilization of out of line look and out of line preliminaries incensed the pioneers, energizing the American Revolution.
They were treated harshly and mostly rejected and protested.
Answer:It will define the nature of a national crisis.
It will detail the fall of Fort Sumter.
It will discuss the other factors that started the war.
It will summarize the main parts of the war.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The significance of having three branches of government is tremendous and can't be overemphasized. Some of the significance includes:
1. It makes the government effective and efficient.
2. Having three branches of government protects the rights of the citizens
3. It prevents arbitrary use of power by the government
Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shouldered only by one branch?
No there are no advantages. If any branch of government turned has all the power of the executive, judiciary, and legislative there will eventually be an arbitrary use of power in the long run, and this will affect the citizens and that society at large. This has been proven in human history in the past in the case of the dictator and absolute monarchy.
