Answer:
One of the reasons for not invading Britain was also an argument against invading her colonies. It was the state of the French Navy. While an invasion of Britain was being considered, Napoleon took a tour of French ports, surveying the shipping and supplies available for war at sea
Explanation:
The Patriot victory at Saratoga<span> is often seen as the </span>turning point in the war<span>. Not only did it renew the morale of the American public, but it convinced potential foreign partners, such as France, that American could win the </span>war<span>, and that it might be in their best interests to send aid.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Which genocide? There were many. That's the worst part of human history-- war and genocides.
The first major problem is hatred. Someone hates someone else. The side doing that hating always has the power to create a genocide. There isn't much that you can do about that: people hate and they have the power to indulge their hatred. There is nothing that can persuade people not to hate. The way to fight it is, sadly, to let the genocide happen.
Usually when people think of genocides, they think of the European one between 1942 and 1945 in Nazi Germany. The war had been going on for just about 3 years before the Wannsee Conference took place in January of 1942. By then Germany was beginning to weaken and people accepted easily that the Jews were somehow at the bottom of loosing the war. The Jews were certainly credited with being at the bottom of the loss of WWI. Still, there was nothing that could be done. Hitler's Propaganda was more easily accepted once Germany's casualties began to mount.
Prior to the Wannsee Conference, Madagascar was suggested as a possible relocation place for the Jews. The high ranking German officials rejected this, especially when Madagascar began to fall to the allies in beginning in May of 1942.
The death camps had their birth in this background.
The doors closed to the Jewish people in Great Britain, in the United States and in every other location they could have gone to.
I hate to be a pessimist, but once the ground work was laid, nothing could prevent a the German Holocaust. There are no steps that could be taken because no one fully disagreed with German Policy.
Answer: I'm balanced I agree and disagree here is why,
Peter C. Perdue's China Marches West argues that the Qing dynasty's ability to break through historical territorial barriers on China's northwestern frontier reflected greater Manchu familiarity with steppe culture than their Chinese predecessors had exhibited, reinforced by superior commercial, technical, and symbolic resources and the benefits of a Russian alliance. Qing imperial expansion illustrated patterns of territorial consolidation apparent as well in Russia's forward movement in Inner Asia and, ironically, in the heroic, if ultimately futile, projects of the western Mongols who fell victim to the Qing. After summarizing Perdue's thesis, this essay extends his comparisons geographically and chronologically to argue that between 1600 and 1800 states ranging from western Europe through Japan to Southeast Asia exhibited similar patterns of political and cultural integration and that synchronized integrative cycles across Eurasia extended from the ninth to the nineteenth centuries. Yet in its growing vulnerability to Inner Asian domination, China proper—along with other sectors of the "exposed zone" of Eurasia—exemplified a species of state formation that was reasonably distinct from trajectories in sectors of Eurasia that were protected against Inner Asian conquest.
Vice President took over from office.
President Ford, should be your answer.
