Answer:
A new post-conflict chapter characterized not by bigotry but by national unity is being written in South Africa. Playing a key role in the rewriting, representation, and remembering of the past is the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission which, in 1996, started the process of officially documenting human rights violations during the years 1960-1993. This nation-building discourse of reconciliation, endorsed by both the present government and South Africa's ruling party, the African National Congress (ANC), has been a crucial agent of a new collective memory after the trauma of apartheid. But the confession of apartheid crimes proved beneficial mostly for perpetrators in search of amnesty rather than a genuine interest in a rehabilitated society. Thus, the amnesty system did very little to advance reconciliation. It is for these reasons that the South African TRC was cynically regarded by its critics as a fiasco, a "Kleenex commission" that turned human suffering into theatrical spectacle watched all over the world. There is, in fact, little that is "new" or "post" in a country that retains apartheid features of inequity. What is often overlooked in this prematurely celebratory language of reconciliation is South Africa's interregnum moment. Caught between two worlds, South Africans are confronted with Antonio Gramsci's conundrum that can be specifically applied to the people of this region: an old order that is dying and not yet dead and a new order that has been conceived but not yet born. And in this interregnum, Gramsci argues, "a great variety of morbid symptoms appear" (276). Terms like "new South Africa" and "rainbow nation," popularized by former president F.W. de Klerk and Desmond Tutu, the former chairperson of the TRC respectively, then, not only ignore the "morbid" aspects of South Africa's bloody road to democracy, but also inaccurately suggest a break with the past. This supposed historical rupture belies the continuities of apartheid.
scorn her.
The glossary is a part of a manual that defines technical vocabulary. A glossary is a sort of a mini dictionary, enlisting only words related to a certain topic, such as technical vocabulary, in this case.
Answer:
Shakespeare is using the monologue.
Explanation:
By reading the text above, we can see that Miranda is telling her father everything she thinks about what happened to the sinking ship and the people who were on it. She demonstrates all of her concern for this ship, what she would have liked to have happened and what she would do if she could avoid this tragedy. All of this is talked about in a long speech. In this way, we can see that Shakespeare made Miranda's speeches a monologue.
The monologue is a long and uninterrupted speech, where the character speaks everything she/he thinks and feels. At that moment, the character may be alone or not, the important thing is that she/he exposes her/his thoughts about something.
Mirando is a character in "The Tempest" a play written by Shakespeare, which tells the story of Pospero, former Duke of Milan, when he was with his daughter, Miranda, isolated on a desert island, planning revenge for those who usurped his real position.
B. Have I included my own opinions about the subject?
<u>The correct answer is: B. To communicate or imply emotions. C. To make a comparison between the reader and nature. D. To vividly describe experiences.</u> In a sonnet the first terceto reflects on the subject and expresses some feeling. The last triplet presents the conclusion of the sonnet and is usually very emotional, ending with a deep reflection or feeling. Poems usually deal with themes of feelings, memories, nature.
