1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natima [27]
3 years ago
5

Discuss the difference between the u.s. federal deficits and the federal debt. 2. explain the nature of federal expenditutures a

nd why so much of the budget is "uncontrollable."
History
1 answer:
Llana [10]3 years ago
5 0
The federal deficits are how much money the country lost when you count the revenue it made from taxes and the expenditures it had to cover. When a budget gets less revenue than it spends, then a deficit is made. Having a deficit in the budget does not mean that you're indebted, nor does having a surplus mean that your debt is non-existent.

The federal debt is the amount of money that the government of the United States is indebted after a deficit happens in the budget. The debt is the combined amount of all deficits from year to year and having a surplus helps repay the debt. For example, the Clinton presidency had a surplus in the budget for a few years, but the surplus was not as large enough to erase the overall debt of the federal government.

There are numerous parts of the federal expenditures which are uncontrollable because you cannot know how much money is actually going to go on that. For example, it's relatively easy to build a defense budget since you know precisely what you're paying and how much, however, the uncontrollable part comes from various funds that are not used by everyone and not everyone reaps the benefits. For example, national disasters are common in the US such as hurricanes or tornadoes or similar things and you can never know how much money as a government you're gonna have to spend on mending problems made by those disasters. Another thing is various welfare programs where the number of applicants changes sometimes drastically.<span />
You might be interested in
Why do u think so many Indians disproved of British rule in India in the late nineteen . ​
Dima020 [189]

<u>Answer</u>:

There were many harmful rules and strategies followed and people were harmed badly.

Thats why so many Indians disproved of British rule in India in the late nineteen.

​

<u>Explanation</u>:

During the late nineteenth century, people disproved the britishers in India. This was because of many violations and harmness caused by them. They started hating them badly. People even felt that is not correct to come to their home land and start conquering and ruling them.

Unfair policies were implemented and indians were treated as slaves of their own country. They hated this descrimination. They were asked to say that only britishers are superior were Indians are not. Their freedom and rights are being pulled off and it is not correct to disrespect people.

5 0
2 years ago
Which one of the following statements is most accurate regarding the manpower compact
anastassius [24]
If you meant mayflower compact, it created the first written frames of government. You didn't give me the statements but, I think this might help you
3 0
3 years ago
The decline in economic production in Europe during the 1300s were caused by
miss Akunina [59]
There were episodes of widespread famines, and also of deadly epidemics. Soil exhaustion, overpopulation, wars, diseases and climate change cause hundreds of famines in medieval Europe.<span> Around 1300, centuries of European prosperity and growth came to a halt. Famines such as </span>Great Famine of 1315–1317<span> slowly weakened the populace. Few people died of starvation because the weakest had already succumbed to a routine disease they otherwise would have survived. A plague like the </span>Black Death<span> killed its victims in one locality in a matter of days or even hours, reducing the population of some areas by half as many survivors fled.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Athens in 450<br> b.c. reached a high point in its culture called the ________ age of athens
Naddik [55]
The crazy age of Athicc
8 0
3 years ago
Should democracies take action to help prevent dictatorships ? Why or why not ?
jeka57 [31]
Idk cause its hard thass why im on here asking yall for the answer wake up
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do you think somr americans feared the new morality
    10·1 answer
  • What was life like in the Americas before the Europeans arrived?
    13·1 answer
  • What led Iraq to invade Kuwait? A. Iraq condemned Kuwait as being ethnically inferior to the Iraqi people. B. Iraq blamed Kuwait
    8·1 answer
  • Which group of people most likely supported the action of British troops during the Boston Massacre?
    11·1 answer
  • Which sentence has an intransitive verb?
    11·2 answers
  • What does it mean that the rights in the First Amendment are not absolute?
    15·1 answer
  • what new direction did civil rights leaders take in the mid 1960s? how was this helpful,and how was this a problem?
    7·1 answer
  • The president pro tempore gives the final vote on a bill<br> True<br> False
    7·1 answer
  • What was one result of the Montgomery bus boycott?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did people in the renaissance admire romans?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!