Answer:1. Viewpoint. They're trying to make you see things their way. They're trying to show drunk driving is bad.
2. The techniques are if it is persuasive or informative and this is more informative.
3. I know the techniques are effective, they make you not want to drunk drive because you'll get caught and possibly arrested.
Explanation:
I don’t see any evidence to support that. I don’t see any morality really. And see no emotion, I think logic would be the answer.
Thanks for using Brainly.
Answer:
it depends on the state
Explanation:
for a fourteen year old it is possible that in that state you can be tried as an adult otherwise you can go to juvinile detention
According to the webpage "Refusing to stand for the National Anthem: Top 3 Pros and Cons," a debate was ignited when one of the NFL players first refused to stand during the national anthem.
The player that ignited the debate is:
<h3>Colin Kaepernick</h3>
Colin Kaepernick is known to be San Francisco 49ers quarterback. He's known to have ignited the debate after he kneeled instead of standing during the National Anthem.
The debate that was ignited was the issue of kneeling or sitting in protest during the national anthem.
Kaepernick actually did that to protest against the racial injustice and the issue of police brutality that goes on in the United States. Many other sports team members in other sports have refused to stand for the national anthem.
Learn more about sports on brainly.com/question/1744272
Answer:
4.
Explanation:
I think it is number 4 because for a little bit it said that it wasn't a fish so I think it was comparing the whale to the fish.
