1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liubo4ka [24]
3 years ago
11

Please Help Meeeeee, Amanda's house is due west of Stamford and due south of Newport. Stamford is 12 kilometers from Amanda's ho

use and 13 kilometers from Newport. How far is Newport from Amanda's house, measured in a straight line? kilometers

Mathematics
1 answer:
lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

  5 km

Step-by-step explanation:

It helps to draw a diagram.

The triangle between Stamford, Newport, and Amanda's house is a right triangle with one leg of length 12 and hypotenuse 13. The Pythagorean theorem can be used to find the remaining leg:

  13² = 12² + (distance to Newport)²

  169 -144 = (distance to Newport)²

  √25 = 5 = distance to Newport

Newport is 5 km from Amanda's house.

_____

It can be useful to remember this right triangle. 5-12-13 right triangles show up in a number of algebra and geometry problems.

You might be interested in
Which property is demonstrated in the equation 21×0=0 ?
attashe74 [19]

Property of Zero because anything multiplied by 0 equals 0. If this is right could I possibly have brainliest? Hope this helped!! :)

7 0
3 years ago
What is 16231 divided by 23
Sholpan [36]

Grab your calculator and enter 16231 then  the divide key then 23 and finally = or exe.

you should get  705.696 to nearest thousandth.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which radical function has been vertical stretched?
Natalija [7]
Hello there,

I believe that your correct answer would be B.

Hope this helps.

~Jurgen


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Euler's formula, V – E + F = 2 relates the number of vertices V, the number of edges E, and the number of faces F of a polyhedro
Alla [95]
F=??
4 vertices mean V=4
6 edges mean E=6
4-6+F=2
-2+F=2
F=4
3 0
3 years ago
the roots of a quadratic equation are 5 and 2/3. if one of the two factors is x-5, what could be a second factor? explain your r
den301095 [7]

As the Remainder Theorem points out, if you divide a polynomial p(x) by a factor x – a of that polynomial, then you will get a zero remainder. Let's look again at that Division Algorithm expression of the polynomial:

Advertisement

p(x) = (x – a)q(x) + r(x)

If x – a is indeed a factor of p(x), then the remainder after division by x – a will be zero. That is:

p(x) = (x – a)q(x)

In terms of the Remainder Theorem, this means that, if x – a is a factor of p(x), then the remainder, when we do synthetic division by

x = a, will be zero.

The point of the Factor Theorem is the reverse of the Remainder Theorem: If you synthetic-divide a polynomial by x = a and get a zero remainder, then, not only is x = a a zero of the polynomial (courtesy of the Remainder Theorem), but x – a is also a factor of the polynomial (courtesy of the Factor Theorem).

Just as with the Remainder Theorem, the point here is not to do the long division of a given polynomial by a given factor. This Theorem isn't repeating what you already know, but is instead trying to make your life simpler. When faced with a Factor Theorem exercise, you will apply synthetic division and then check for a zero remainder.

Use the Factor Theorem to determine whether x – 1 is a factor of

    f (x) = 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7.

For x – 1 to be a factor of  f (x) = 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7, the Factor Theorem says that x = 1 must be a zero of  f (x). To test whether x – 1 is a factor, I will first set x – 1 equal to zero and solve to find the proposed zero, x = 1. Then I will use synthetic division to divide f (x) by x = 1. Since there is no cubed term, I will be careful to remember to insert a "0" into the first line of the synthetic division to represent the omitted power of x in 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7:

completed division: 2  2  5  0  7

Since the remainder is not zero, then the Factor Theorem says that:

x – 1 is not a factor of f (x).

Using the Factor Theorem, verify that x + 4 is a factor of

     f (x) = 5x4 + 16x3 – 15x2 + 8x + 16.

If x + 4 is a factor, then (setting this factor equal to zero and solving) x = –4 is a root. To do the required verification, I need to check that, when I use synthetic division on  f (x), with x = –4, I get a zero remainder:

completed division: 5  –4  1  4  0

The remainder is zero, so the Factor Theorem says that:

x + 4 is a factor of 5x4 + 16x3 – 15x2 + 8x + 16.

In practice, the Factor Theorem is used when factoring polynomials "completely". Rather than trying various factors by using long division, you will use synthetic division and the Factor Theorem. Any time you divide by a number (being a potential root of the polynomial) and get a zero remainder in the synthetic division, this means that the number is indeed a root, and thus "x minus the number" is a factor. Then you will continue the division with the resulting smaller polynomial, continuing until you arrive at a linear factor (so you've found all the factors) or a quadratic (to which you can apply the Quadratic Formula).

Using the fact that –2 and 1/3 are zeroes of  f (x) = 3x4 + 5x3 + x2 + 5x – 2, factor the polynomial completely.   Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved

If x = –2 is a zero, then x + 2 = 0, so x + 2 is a factor. Similarly, if x = 1/3 is a zero, then x – 1/3 = 0, so x – 1/3 is a factor. By giving me two of the zeroes, they have also given me two factors: x + 2 and x – 1/3.

Since I started with a fourth-degree polynomial, then I'll be left with a quadratic once I divide out these two given factors. I can solve that quadratic by using the Quadratic Formula or some other method.

The Factor Theorem says that I don't have to do the long division with the known factors of x + 2 and x – 1/3. Instead, I can use synthetic division with the associated zeroes –2 and 1/3. Here is what I get when I do the first division with x = –2:

completed divison: bottom row:  3  –1  3  –1  0

The remainder is zero, which is expected because they'd told me at the start that –2 was a known zero of the polynomial. Rather than starting over again with the original polynomial, I'll now work on the remaining polynomial factor of 3x3 – x2 + 3x – 1 (from the bottom line of the synthetic division). I will divide this by the other given zero, x = 1/3:

completed division:  bottom row:  3  0  3  0

This leaves me with the quadratic 3x2 + 3, which I can solve:

3x2 + 3 = 0

3(x2 + 1) = 0

x2 + 1 = 0

x2 = –1

x = ± i

If the zeroes are x = –i and x = i, then the factors are x – (–i) and x – (i), or x + i and x – i. I need to remember that I divided off a "3" when I solved the quadratic; it is still part of the polynomial, and needs to be included as a factor. Then the fully-factored form is:

3x4 + 5x3 + x2 + 5x – 2 = 3(x + 2)(x – 1/3)(x + i)(x – i)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Y=a(x-p)(x-q)is which form? standard intercept vertex or slope intercept​
    14·1 answer
  • AB has endpoints at A(4, -8) and B(-6, -2).<br> What are the coordinates of the midpoint of AB?
    7·1 answer
  • A rotation maps point A(5, 4) to A’(–4, 5).
    9·1 answer
  • -4x+y= 6 <br>-5x-y=21 what is the answer​
    12·1 answer
  • Help meee plssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
    11·1 answer
  • Which rule explains why these triangles are congruent?
    8·2 answers
  • Is a circle a function?
    9·1 answer
  • I will mark brainliest!
    12·1 answer
  • F(x) = 10*(x + 5)²<br>f(5) = ? ​
    12·2 answers
  • Estimate the difference of the decimals below by rounding to the nearest
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!