Answer:
C, the board of directors of IFS
Explanation:
The board of the IFS is ultimately responsible for the corporate climate that resulted in the use of substandard ingredients in the meals meant for the troops.
This is because the directors are the ones at the helm of affairs and they decide what happens in the IFS. This means that at least one of the directors is aware of the use of substandard ingredients . It can be said that if one knows, all other know. This phrase convieniently indicts the directors.
Cheers.
Answer:
The economic incentive was to produce enough to meet the output target, without regard for quality or cost.
Explanation:
As the only condition for the payment to the producers is linked with the output thus there is no constraint for the quality and the sales of the product. This indicated that the producer will get the reward irrespective whether the quality or cost of the product is feasible or not.
Answer:
B) $(1,813)
Explanation:
Initial investment = 17,550
Annual cashflows = 2,650
Terminal Cashflow = 500
You can solve for NPV using financial calculator with the following inputs;
CF0= -17,550
C01 = 2,650
F01 (Frequency) = 19
C02 = 2,650 + 500 = 3,150
I=16%
Net present value; NPV = -1,812.879 or -1,813 rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Answer:
D. Only customers receive a financial institution privacy notice automatically
Explanation:
Let us take an illustration of all the points, primarily A is inaccurate because simply customers acquire a financial institution's privacy note directly. B and C are unreliable because, depending on the bank's privacy practices, both consumers and customers may have rights under the law and be able to opt-out. So, the answer will be D as we know that, the Privacy Rule demands thou to provide a note to each of your "customers" regarding your privacy systems.
