1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
3 years ago
14

There is now no restriction on the amount of money that organizations or individuals can give to candidates in national election

s due to a ruling by _____.
A. the U.S. Senate
B. the Supreme Court
C. a majority of states
D. the Republican Party
History
2 answers:
Semmy [17]3 years ago
6 0
There is now no restriction on the amount of money that organizations or individuals can give to candidates in national elections due to a ruling by "the Supreme Court", although this ruling was highly controversial. 
Damm [24]3 years ago
3 0

<em>The correct answer is "B": There is now no restriction on the amount of money that organizations or individuals can give to candidates in national elections due to a ruling by </em><em>the Supreme Court. </em>

The day after the 2002 midterm elections, new federal laws concerning campaign finance which became known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), were put into effect. The BCRA increased the contribution limits for individuals who wanted to give money to federal candidates and political parties. The Federal Election Commission updated these contribution limits every two years since these limitis had to be indexed to inflation. However, since 2014,  according to a Supreme Court's decision, there is no longer a limit on how much an individual can give in total to all candidates and party committees.

You might be interested in
How did the presence of the border states illustrate a difference between the Union and Confederacy?
grin007 [14]
The presence of the border states illustrated that the union's population was divided on the issue of slavery. The correct answer is C. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the mercantilism increase the likelihood of conflics between european powers
Umnica [9.8K]

it led to dispute over who could trade where, and disputes over the trade agreements themselves, since every country wanted the best deal.

5 0
4 years ago
What is 30 perent of 65
makkiz [27]

Answer:

\large\boxed{19.5}

Explanation:

30% of 65

Write 30% as a decimal

30% = 0.3

Multiply 0.3 * 65 to find 30% of 65

0.3 * 65

\large\boxed{19.5}

Hope this helps :)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would jane addams lobby for mandatory school attendance for children?
Trava [24]
The answer is because she saw the benefit of education to children. (C)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the name of the dark line shown on this map? Who created the line?
faust18 [17]
Is there a map or something??
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What group of people supported the conservative resurgence?
    5·2 answers
  • What sparked a new period of colonial expansion for england in the mid-seventeenth century?
    5·1 answer
  • The 1957 launch of sputnik by the soviet union embarrassed the united states because it
    7·1 answer
  • Of the three types of colonies that existed in the New World, which one had the most independence from the king?
    11·1 answer
  • Enter the word you received when you completed the feudalism in the Middle Ages: Europe and Japan activity.
    12·2 answers
  • The creation and maintenance of the local county hospital would be _______?
    9·1 answer
  • The atomic bomb was dropped three times. true or false?
    13·1 answer
  • What did many Japanese have to do before moving to the internment camps?
    7·1 answer
  • How does the Manor system impact the economy[buying/selling]
    11·1 answer
  • A number of Puritans in the Massachusetts Bay Colony disagreed with religious leaders there and founded which two new colonies
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!