1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
3 years ago
14

There is now no restriction on the amount of money that organizations or individuals can give to candidates in national election

s due to a ruling by _____.
A. the U.S. Senate
B. the Supreme Court
C. a majority of states
D. the Republican Party
History
2 answers:
Semmy [17]3 years ago
6 0
There is now no restriction on the amount of money that organizations or individuals can give to candidates in national elections due to a ruling by "the Supreme Court", although this ruling was highly controversial. 
Damm [24]3 years ago
3 0

<em>The correct answer is "B": There is now no restriction on the amount of money that organizations or individuals can give to candidates in national elections due to a ruling by </em><em>the Supreme Court. </em>

The day after the 2002 midterm elections, new federal laws concerning campaign finance which became known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), were put into effect. The BCRA increased the contribution limits for individuals who wanted to give money to federal candidates and political parties. The Federal Election Commission updated these contribution limits every two years since these limitis had to be indexed to inflation. However, since 2014,  according to a Supreme Court's decision, there is no longer a limit on how much an individual can give in total to all candidates and party committees.

You might be interested in
escribe el nombre de dos países asiáticos que se vieran envuelto en conflictos durante el periodo de la guuerra fria
aleksley [76]

Answer:

Japón y Corea del Sur. Creo que eso es correcto. Espero que esto haya ayudado

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The British government decided to tax the American colonies
Inessa05 [86]

Answer:

to pay off war debts

Explanation:

This was from the French and Indian war.

So the King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to help pay for the debts of war

8 0
3 years ago
16.04 semester test world history
Oduvanchick [21]

i dont know sorry :(

Explanation:

mark as brainlist

plssss

8 0
3 years ago
Why was Altus Air Force Base important to the Cold War?
Lelu [443]

Answer: Its Believe your answer to be B yung chicken nugget

mark me brainlest

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John Brown formulated a plan to seize the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, free and arm the enslaved people there, an
Leokris [45]
He wanted to begin a riot/revolution sadly he and his sons died in a fire fight against the union soldiers the fire fight ended around 1 am
hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did progressives feel they could improve society
    14·1 answer
  • Why is the color blue named blue and who named it ????
    5·2 answers
  • Describe your findings in a few paragraphs. Including a brief description of the description of the disorder and it's causes , r
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the league of Nations
    8·2 answers
  • Need help please and thank you
    6·2 answers
  • Who settled the colony of Carolina? apex
    5·1 answer
  • How soon after war broke out was this cartoon published?
    11·1 answer
  • A series of natural disasters occurred to negitively effect the Aztec civilization. In 1449 a devistating flood wiped out the cr
    7·1 answer
  • How many treaties did Governor Stevens negotiate with the Natives?
    15·2 answers
  • In addition to the potential destabilization of the Ottoman Empire, Giolitti's argument in Source 2 regarding Italy's ambitions
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!