Which two statements about first-person narration are generally true? The narrator can be a witness or a reteller of events. The
narrator always provides reliable information. The narrator accurately knows past and future events. The narrator is a character in the story. The narrator knows everything about all characters.
The narrator can be a witness or a reteller of events; The narrator is a character in the story.
Explanation:
In first person narrators, it usually is the case that they are either witnesses to the events being recounted or they are actual characters in the story, telling the story from their first person perspective. This is different to third person narrators or omniscient narrators which can recount the story without having played a part in it and, in the case of the omniscient narrator, possessing, or seeming to possess, all information about events as they will happen and characters as they are developed.
Giving a counterargument allows the essay/writing to contain more perspectives that strengthen the claims as more perspectives allow the reader/viewer to see an overall "picture" of the argument. Also, being able to "debunk" the counterargument as false or not strong will help in strengthening your own essay/argument.
Including only your side of the argument leaves the reader/viewer no perspective of the whole topic.