Hitler appealed to the nationalism of German people in that he promised to restore German dignity after Germany lost WWI and was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles. The Teatry had numerous clauses the made German people angry and frustrated. So one of Hitler´s first promises was to abolish this treaty. Next, he promised to restore and rebuild Germany´s economy by givng farmers land, improving pensions and also making electical and water companies public. They would belong to all Germans.
Germany´s middle and lower classes were eager to punish those enemies that had led their country to hypeinflation and economic ruin. Hitler mainly appealed to restoring Germany´s national pride.This nationalistic future of a united and prosperous country that did not welcome immigrants or other ethnic groups made Hitler´s promises appealing.
he rise conservatism embodied in the candidacy of Ronald Reagan should be examined in light of events dating to the mid-1970s.
In the wake of the end of the Vietnam War, and with the domestic political turmoil still fresh from the war's divisiveness and from the Watergate scandal, the country was deeply split along ideological lines. Even within the Republican Party, conservatives were deeply divided between moderates and those further to the right.
Answer:
once every 2 weeks so a fortnight
Explanation:
Roman society was one that constantly pushed romans to be more and more ambitious, to take more, do more and conquer more. Eventually you start stepping on people's toes who are trying to do the same thing, then you have two powerful people fighting for ultimate power (ceaser v. pompey, sulla v. marius, augustus v. marc anthony, etc.). Then there was the Marian reforms which made soldiers beholdened primarily to their general, not the state, for their rewards (usually land after the campaign was finished), couple that with legions frequently going further and further from Rome in the late republic, most Roman soldiers knew and depended on their general, and barely interacted with the state at all. So these generals gradually gained ferociously loyal armies that were closer to them than Rome in general, so they'd be pretty willing to fight for their general against another general, even when it would weaken the state as a whole. Obviously civil wars cause a huge amount of damage to their nation, both in lives and monetary cost. Plus usually whoever won the civil war would then proceed to kill all prominent citizens who even slightly leaned toward the opposing side. After two or three purges like this, many of the prominent families that made rome into a world power were completely in shambles and the bitter rivalries between them made future wars inevitable.
